J. J. MUNIR
Siddiq Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
Shaukat Ali – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
J.J. Munir, J.
This is a defendant's second appeal, arising out of a preliminary decree passed in a suit for partition.
2. Original Suit No. 22 of 1976 was instituted by Shaukat Ali, arraying Nasiban Bibi as defendant No. 1 and Rasheed @ Kallu, Shaukat Ali's son as the second defendant. Jogendra Nath @ Lahiri and Lallu were arrayed as defendant Nos. 3 and 4 to the suit and Jamir Ahmad @ Jhamman Driver as the fifth defendant.
3. Shaukat Ali sought partition of the four houses, shown in Schedule A to the plaint. The relief of partition is confined to Shaukat Ali, defendant Nos. 1 and 2. The other three defendants have been impleaded for reasons that shall be shortly indicated. The four houses set out in Schedule A to the plaint shall hereinafter be referred to as 'the suit property'.
4. The plaintiff pleaded a pedigree to indicate the relationship between himself and defendant Nos. 1 and 2. The said pedigree, set out in Paragraph No. 1 of the plaint, is detailed below:
| Shakuran
|
| Khoob Ali
| Smt. Niranjani Bibi
| |
| Nasiban (Daughter)
| Bashiran (Daughte | |||
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.