DINESH PATHAK
Chandrashekhar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Dinesh Pathak, J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 4.3.2022 (Annexure-8) passed by the Consolidation Commissioner (respondent No. 4), rejecting the representation dated 31.12.2021 moved by one Awadhesh Mishra, in pursuance of the order dated 18.11.2021 passed by this Court in Writ-B No. 1764 of 2021; Awadhesh Mishra v. State of U.P. and others (Annexure-7).
3. Grievance of the petitioner is that village Chandadih, Pargana Sikendarpur, Tehsil Belthara Road, District Ballia has illegally been brought under the consolidation operation by issuing notification under Section 4-A of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act (in brevity 'U.P.C.H. Act') promulgated on 27.5.2016 and the Consolidation Commissioner has illegally rejected the representation without adverting to the grievance raised before him.
4. Facts culled out from the averments made in the writ petition are that some of the villagers have shown their dissatisfaction against the issuance of notification under Section 4-A of the U.P.C.H. Act, inter alia, on the grounds that previously, con
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.