MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI
Bharar Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
[Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, J.]
1. Heard Shri Vijay Gautam, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Ms. Atipriya Gautam for the petitioner and Shri Apurva Hajela, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.
2. Petitioner, who is working as Constable (Civil Police) at Reserve Police Lines, Chitrakoot, has challenged the departmental proceedings initiated against him in pursuance of departmental charge-sheet dated 27.4.2020, on the ground that with identical charge and on the basis of same evidence the First Information Report was lodged against him on 8.6.2018 and the same was registered as Case Crime No. 53/2018 under Section 302 IPC, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Hamirpur. It is contended that since the allegations are identical and the basis to proceed both departmentally and in criminal trial are same, therefore, prejudice would be caused to the petitioner in case disciplinary proceedings and criminal trial are allowed to go on simultaneously. Reliance is placed upon a judgment of the Apex Court in Capt. M. Paul Anthony v. Bharat Coal Mines Ltd., AIR 1999 SC 1416, as well as State Bank of India and others v. R.B. Sharma, (2004) 7 SCC 27. Reliance is also placed up
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.