SARAL SRIVASTAVA
Ashish Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Saral Srivastava, J.
1. Heard Sri Akash Khare, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Abhishek Srivastava learned counsel for the respondents-Corporation.
2. The petitioner through the present writ petition has prayed for a direction upon respondents to consider the candidature of the petitioner for appointment on the post of Junior Engineer Electrical (Trainee) in U.P. Power Corporation Ltd.
3. During the pendency of the writ petition, the respondent has passed an order on 25.3.2017 rejecting the candidature of the petitioner which was challenged by the petitioner by way of amendment in the writ petition.
4. The case of the petitioner is that pursuant to an Advertisement No. 9/V5A/2016/JE notified on 9.10.2016 inviting online application for the post of Junior Engineer Electrical (Trainee) under the Electrical Engineer category, Junior Engineer Civil (Trainee) under the category of Civil Engineering, he has submitted application for being considered on the said post.
5. According to the petitioner, he has three years diploma in Electrical and Electronics Engineering f
Mohd. Shohrab Khan vs. Aligarh Muslim University
Manoj Kumar Singh and Others vs. State of U.P. and Others
P.M. Latha and Another vs. State of Kerla and Others
Sanjay Kumar Manjul vs. Chairman, UPSC and Others
Shailendra Kumar Rai and Others vs. State of U.P and Others
Zahoor Ahmad Rather and Others vs. Sheikh Imtiyaz Ahmad and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.