SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(All) 1676

SARAL SRIVASTAVA
Ashish Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Hari Om, A. Khare.
For the Respondents: Abhishek Srivastava, Ayank Mishra, J.P. Pandey.

JUDGMENT :

Saral Srivastava, J.

1. Heard Sri Akash Khare, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Abhishek Srivastava learned counsel for the respondents-Corporation.

2. The petitioner through the present writ petition has prayed for a direction upon respondents to consider the candidature of the petitioner for appointment on the post of Junior Engineer Electrical (Trainee) in U.P. Power Corporation Ltd.

3. During the pendency of the writ petition, the respondent has passed an order on 25.3.2017 rejecting the candidature of the petitioner which was challenged by the petitioner by way of amendment in the writ petition.

4. The case of the petitioner is that pursuant to an Advertisement No. 9/V5A/2016/JE notified on 9.10.2016 inviting online application for the post of Junior Engineer Electrical (Trainee) under the Electrical Engineer category, Junior Engineer Civil (Trainee) under the category of Civil Engineering, he has submitted application for being considered on the said post.

5. According to the petitioner, he has three years diploma in Electrical and Electronics Engineering f

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top