MOHD. FAIZ ALAM KHAN
Kalpana Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Shri Rajesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant/ appellant, Ms. Sonal Pandey, learned counsel for private respondent no.2 in application under Section 378 No. 262 of 2017 and for respondent no.2 and 5 in Application under Section 378 No. 261 of 2017 as well as learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
2. At the outset learned counsel for the applicant/ appellant submits that respondent no.3-Awadhesh Chandra Gupta and respondent no.4-Smt. Dhaneshwari Gupta had died during the pendency of the instant application/ appeal and the proceedings against them be abated.
3. Ms. Sonal Pandey, learned counsel appearing for respondents no. 2 to 5 in A, 378 No. 261 of 2017 does not dispute this fact, therefore the proceedings of application under Section 378 No. 261 of 2017 is abated so far as the respondent no.3-Awadesh Chandra Gupta and respondent no.4-Smt. Dhaneshwari Gupta are concerned.
4. Both above placed applications moved under Section 378(4) Cr.P.C. are connected with the same complaint case, whereby the accused persons / respondent nos.2 to 6 of Criminal Appeal No.262 of 2017 have been acquitted of all the charges and accused '' Santosh Kumar Gu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.