Amitabh Dixit vs State of U. P. - 2023 Supreme(All) 34

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(All) 34

RAMESH SINHA, MOHD. ASLAM
Amitabh Dixit – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Ram Chandra Singh, Arun Sinha.
For the Respondents: Bal Keshwar Srivastava, Hari Bux Singh, Izhar Husain Siddiqui, Upendra Kumar Awasthi, Vijay Kishor Mishra.

JUDGMENT :

MOHD. ASLAM, J.

1. Heard Sri Arun Sinha, learned counsel for the appellant, Sri Vijay Kishor Mishra, learned counsel for the complainant and Smt. Smiti Sahay, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State/respondent.

2. This criminal appeal has been filed under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C. by the appellant/convict Amitabh Dixit against the impugned common judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 16.12.2004 passed by Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. 4, Hardoi in Sessions Trial No. 673 of 2003 (State vs. Amitabh Dixit), arising out of Case Crime No. 209 of 2003, under Sections 302/307 I.P.C. Police Station Shahabad, District-Hardoi and Session Trial No. 674 of 2003 (State vs. Amitabh Dixit), arising out of Case Crime No. 266 of 2003, under Section 25 Arms Act, Police Station-Shahabad, District Hardoi, whereby the appellant was convicted for offence punishable under Section 302 I.P.C. and Section 25 Arms Act and was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life along with fine of Rs. 5000/- under Section 302 I.P.C. and further to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years along with fine of Rs. 500/- under Section 25 of Arms Act, in default