ANJANI KUMAR MISHRA, UMESH CHANDRA SHARMA
Shyam Behari Mishra – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Umesh Chandra Sharma, J.
1. These two appeals have been preferred against the judgment and order dated 2.3.2005 passed by Additional Sessions Judge Court No.5, Allahabad, in S.T. No. 807 of 2000 State Vs. Shyam Bihari Mishra and Others, under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC and Section 307 read with Section 34 IPC. Police Station Sarai Inayat, District- Allahabad, convicting and sentencing the appellants under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for life imprisonment and under Section 307 read with Section 34 IPC for 3 years rigorous imprisonment. Both sentences were directed to run concurrently.
2. In brief, the facts of the case are that informant Shiv Prakash Tiwari r/o Kotwa, police station- Sarai Inayat, Allahabad presented a tehrir Ex. Ka-1 on 10.4.2000 at 9:30 a.m. stating therein that today at about 8:30 am, his brother Jai Prakash Tiwari was returning after worshiping at Goddess Maa Endree Devi Temple with nephew (Bhanja) Kuldeep Mishra on a scooter when he reached near his house, he slowed down his scooter due to drain, Shyam Bihari Mishra exhorted to ki
Podda Narain Vs. State of A.P.
Swaran Singh Vs. State of Punjab
Bharat Singh Vs. State of U.P.
Sarvesh Narain Shukla Vs. Daroga Singh
Bhagwan Jagannath Markad Vs. State of Maharashtra
Sucha Singh Vs. State of Punjab
Dilawar Singh Vs. State of Haryana
Ramesh Harijan Vs. State of U.P.
Sheo Shankar Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand
Dhanaj Singh Vs. State of Punjab
M.K. Upadhyaya Vs. State of A.P.
Anand Mohan Vs. State of Bihar
Ramdev and Another Vs. State of Rajasthan
State (NCT of Delhi) Vs. Navjot Sandhu
Binay Kumar Singh Vs. State of Bihar
State of U.P. Vs. Sughar Singh
Dudh Nath Pandey Vs. State of U.P.
Shaik Sattar Vs. State of Maharashtra
Om Prakash Vs. State of Rajasthan & Another
Adalat Pandit Vs. State of Bihar
Barendra Kumar Ghosh Vs. King Emperor
Maruti Rama Naik Vs. State of Maharashtra
State of U.P. Vs. Parshuram Yadav
Daud Khan Vs. State of Rajasthan
Brahm Swaroop Vs. State of U.P.
Shiv Shankar Singh Vs. State of U.P.
Samsul Haque Vs. State of Assam
Ganesh Bhavan Patel and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra
Tahsildar Singh v. State of UP
Bharwada Bhoginbhai Hirjibhai v. State of Gujarat
Lekhraj @ Hari Singh Vs. State of Gujarat
Saddik @ Lalo Gulam Hussein Shaikh and others v. State of Gujarat
Raj Gopal Vs. Muthupandi @ Thavakkalai and others
Girish Yadav and others Vs. State of M.P.
Maharaj Singh Vs. State of U.P.
Ram Sajeevan Singh and others Vs. State of Bihar
State of U.P. Vs. Gokaran and Others
Pala Singh Vs. State of Punjab
State of Punjab Vs. Hakam Singh
The court emphasized that framing charges requires a prima facie case supported by credible evidence and witness statements without conducting a mini trial.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.