K. J. THAKER, MOHD. AZHAR HUSAIN IDRISI
State of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Devraj – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Patanjali Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State. None present for the original accused. This is a Government Appeal of the year 1992 listed time and again.
2. This appeal under Section 378 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'Cr.P.C.'), at the behest of the State, has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 28.2.1992 passed by learned Special Judge, Bijnor acquitting accused-respondent who was tried for commission of offence under Sections 376 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as 'IPC').
3. Brief facts as culled out from the record are that on 1/2.07.1990 at about midnight accused who was sleeping outstairs told the prosecutrix-Manju that her sister Anneta wife of deceased was suffering from Cholera and was taken to Bijnor and she too had to follow them to Bijnor but when prosecutrix came down the stairs accused Devraj flashed a knife and forcibly pulled the prosecutrix inside the room and committed rape on her.
4. The F.I.R culminated into charge-sheet and accused were committed to Sessions.
5. On being summo
M.S. Narayana Menon @ Mani Vs. State Of Kerala & Anr
Chandrappa Vs. State Of Karnataka
Luna Ram Vs. Bhupat Singh And Ors.
Mookkiah And Anr. Vs. State, Rep. By The Inspector Of Police, Tamil Nadu
State of Rajasthan vs. Sohan Lal and Others
Girija Nandini Devi V. Bigendra Nandini Choudhary (1967) 1 SCR 93: (AIR 1967 SC 1124)
State Of Punjab Vs. Madan Mohan Lal Verma
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.