VIVEK KUMAR BIRLA, SURENDRA SINGH I
Prachi – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Surendra Singh-I, J.
1. Heard Sri Neeraj Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Shiv Sagar Singh, learned counsel for the informant and Smt. Manju Thakur, learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. Learned A.G.A. pointed out that Section 368 I.P.C. has been added during the course of investigation.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be permitted to correct the prayer clause.
4. Prayer is allowed.
5. He may do so during the course of the day.
6. The present writ petition has been preferred with the prayer to quash the impugned first information report dated 03.03.2023 registered as Case Crime No. 129 of 2023 under Sections 366, 368 I.P.C., Police Station- Tronica City, District- (Commissionerate) Ghaziabad, and for a direction to the respondents not to arrest the petitioner no. 2, Ashish Chauhan in pursuance of the impugned first information report.?
7. According to prosecution case, on 01.03.2023 at 11.45 p.m., petitioner, Ashish Chauhan, enticed and abducted the daughter of informant, Prachi aged 21 years from her home with the intention of marrying her against her wishes. Knowing that Prachi has been abducted, he wrongfully conceals and confines h
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.