SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Guj) 413

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
DIVYESH A. JOSHI, J.
Vijaykumar Vitthalbhai Mathukiya – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat & Anr. – Respondents
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR QUASHING & SET ASIDE FIR/ORDER) NO. 24069 of 2018
Decided on : 15-04-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : MR VAIBHAV A VYAS
For the Respondent: MR HARDIK S SONI

IMPORTANT POINT
If a minor voluntarily leaves the guardianship and joins someone without inducement or pressure, no offence under Section 363 IPC is made out if the girl is aged more than 17 years and is mature enough to understand her actions.

Headnote:

ABDUCTION - Criminal Law - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Section 482 - 363 IPC - Summary: The court discussed the provisions of Section 363 of the Indian Penal Code and the interpretation of 'kidnapping from lawful guardianship'. It emphasized that if a minor voluntarily leaves the guardianship and joins someone without inducement or pressure, no offence under Section 363 IPC is made out if the girl is aged more than 17 years and is mature enough to understand her actions. The court also referred to the conditions for quashing criminal proceedings as laid down by the Supreme Court in State of Haryana and others Vs. Ch. Bhajan Lal and others AIR 1992 SC 604.

Fact of the Case:

The case involved a girl who eloped with the accused and got married, leading to the filing of an FIR by the girl's father alleging abduction.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the victim girl had voluntarily left her parental home and married the accused, and the ingredients of Section 363 IPC were not satisfied.

Issues: The main issue was whether the court should quash the complaint.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that if a minor voluntarily leaves the guardianship and joins someone without inducement or pressure, no offence under Section 363 IPC is made out if the girl is aged more than 17 years and is mature enough to understand her actions.

Final Decision: The court quashed the FIR and ordered all consequential proceedings to be terminated.

ORDER :

1. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned APP waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent no.2.

2. The respondent no.2, although served with the notice issued by this Court, has chosen not to remain present either in person or through an advocate and oppose this application.

3. By this application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant-original accused seeks to invoke the inherent powers of this Court praying for quashing of the proceedings of the F.I.R. being C.R. No.I-317 of 2018 registered with the Varachha Police Station, Surat, for the offence punishable under Sections-363 of the I.P.C.

4. The case of the prosecution in nutshell may be summarized as under:-

4.1 The impugned FIR has been filed by the respondent no.2 – original complainant, who happens to be the father of the girl stating that on the date of incident i.e. on 06.09.2018 at around 09:00 a.m. the complainant had gone to drop her daughter at Pratibimb Studio situated at Varachha Super Diamond Building as she was working there. Thereafter, the complainant returned back to his home. Thereafter, at around 11 o’clock, the elder sister of the complainant residing at Varachha Matavadi informed the complainant that she received a phone call of one Nileshbhai from Pratibimb Photo Studio who told her that photos of your grandson are ready and therefore, I asked him to give phone to Jinal working in your shop, upon which, he told me that Jinal is on leave. Therefore, the complainant told her sister that he himself had gone to drop her at studio at 9:00 a.m. Thereafter, the complainant and his wife went to the Pratibimb Photo Studio and at that time, Nileshbhai made a phone call on the mobile of jinal and asked her where is she. At that time, the victim girl replied that she was at her own home and cut the phone. Thereafter, the complainant called her daughter on mobile, but the mobile phone of her daughter was switched off. The complainant tried to search out his daughter at nearby area as well as at the house of her friends. Thereafter, at 6:00 o’clock in the evening, the victim girl called the complainant on mobile phone and told him that they do not try to find out her. Thus, having strong apprehension of his daughter being kidnapped by an unknown person, the present FIR has been filed against an unknown person.

5. Mr. Smit Vaghela, learned advocate appearing on behalf of Mr. Vaibhav Vyas, learned advocate for the applicant submits that as per the case of the prosecution, on 06.09.2018 the complainant’s daughter had gone on her job and after certain period of time, when he made a phone call to the employer of the girl, at that point of time, the employer informed that the girl did not come to the office, therefore, the complainant tried his level best to find out her the whereabouts of her daughter, but the complainant could not able to trace her out. Thereafter, the complainant came to know that somebody has abducted her daughter and therefore, criminal complaint in that regard is registered before the concerned police station. Pursuant to the registration of the said FIR, the investigation had also been commenced.

6. Learned advocate Mr. Smit Vaghela further submits that as the complainant’s daughter has come with the present applicant-accused, he has immediately approached the concerned Sessions Court by way of preferring anticipatory bail application, which was eventually considered by this Hon’ble Court. Thereafter, the victim girl was called by the Investigating Officer time and again to record her statement, but on the said day, when this so-called incident occurred, the present applicant and the victim girl has solemnized their marriage at Kamnath Mahadev Temple, A.K. Road, Surat in the presence of relatives and on the strength of the solemnization of the marriage, a marriage certificate is also issued by the Registrar (Marriage), East Zone, Surat, wherein, it is stated in categorically terms that they ha

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top