SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 214

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, JJ.
Dr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma - Petitioner
Versus
Chancellor Chaudhary Charan Singh University Meerut and Ors. - Respondents
Writ - A No. 13842 of 2021
Decided On : 13-04-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Chandra Bhushan Pandey, Asim Kumar Singh.
For the Respondent: C.S.C., Avneesh Tripathi, Subhash Bisaria.

Point of Law: Regulation 6.2 B (iv) of NCTE Regulations, 2014 clearly provides that candidates should either possess of experience as prescribed by UGC or by State Government.

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - U.P. State Universities Act, 1973 - Section 68, 21(vii), 49, 50, (6) - UGC Regulations, 2010 - Regulation 4.4.7 B (ii) - NCTE Regulations, 2014 - Regulation 6.2 B(iv) - Post of Associate Professor - Ineligible for appointment - Minimum eligibility - Assails validity of an Order - Petitioner assails validity of an Order by respondent No.6 challenging appointment of petitioner on post of Associate Professor in Education in University has been allowed and he has been held to be ineligible for appointment ot post in question. [Para 20]

Finding of the Court: Court observe that only reason indicated by Hon'ble Chancellor for holding that petitioner did not fulfill requisite qualification for being considered for appointment to post of Associate Professor is that though he did have eight years teaching experience, however, he did not have three years experience of teaching at M.Ed. level - However, Statute of First Statutes inserted by means of State Government Notification appears to have lost sight of by Hon'ble the Chancellor while passing order impugned before court - It is also not in dispute that NCTE Regulations 2014 are applicable for reason that advertisement in this case was issued in year - Relevant Regulation of NCTE Regulation, 2014, namely, Regulation 6.2 B (iv) has already been discussed above, which uses word 'or' and thus, any candidate fulfilling requisite qualification prescribed either by UGC or by State Government, in court considered opinion, will have the minimum eligibility for being considered for appointment to post of Associate Professor in Faculty of Education in University – Court is convinced that order passed by Hon'ble Chancellor is not sustainable.

Result: Petition allowed.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Chandra Bhushan Pandey and Ms. Akansha Rajput for the petitioner, Sri Himanshu Suryavanshi for the Chancellor, Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut [here-in-after referred to as 'the University'], learned State Counsel representing the State authorities and Subhash Bisaria, learned Counsel representing the authorities of the University.

2. Though service of this petition upon respondent No.6, as reported vide office note dated 01.10.2021 is sufficient, however neither the respondent No.6 nor anyone representing her is present.

3. By instituting these proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner assails the validity of an Order dated 03.03.2021 passed by the Hon'ble Chancellor of the University, whereby the Reference made under Section 68 of the U.P. State Universities Act, 1973 (here-in-after referred to as 'the Act, 1973') by the respondent No.6 challenging the appointment of the petitioner on the post of Associate Professor in Education in the University has been allowed and he has been held to be ineligible for appointment ot the post in question. The Hon'ble Chancellor has further directed the Executive Council of the University which is the Appointing Authority of the Teachers in the University to take further action. Pursuant to the said order of the Hon'ble Chancellor dated 03.03.2021, the Executive Council in its resolution passed on 15.03.2021 has terminated the services of the petitioner on the post of Associate Professor in the University. The petitioner has also challenged the order of relieving dated 16.0.2021 which has been passed pursuant to the resolution of the Executive Council of the University dated 15.03.2021.

4. The sole issue for consideration before this Court in this case is, as to whether in terms of the Rules regulating the appointment on the post of Associate Professor in the University, the petitioner was possessed with the minimum eligibility or not.

5. An Advertisement bearing No.2/20217 was issued by the University inviting applications for recruitment to various teaching posts in the University including the post of Associate Professor in Education, which was unreserved. Clause - 5 of the advertisement stipulated that the qualification for recruitment to the posts as advertised shall be as per the First Statutes of the University as amended by the Government Notification dated 12.12.2013 (This date is wrongly mentioned. As a matter of fact, the date of the Government Notification is 03.12.2013). Clause 5 further provides that details of qualification and other relevant provisions for recruitment are given at page - 2 to 4 of the advertisement and further that the University reserves the right to amend qualification as per the latest laws in force. Clause - 5 of the Advertisement is extracted here-in-below:-

    "5. Qualifications are as per First Statutes of Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut and as amended by U.P. Govt. Notification No.377/Sattar--2013-16(114)/2010 dated 12.12.2013. Details of qualifications and other relevant provisions for recruitment are given on page 2 to 4. University reserves the right to amend the qualifications as per latest laws enforced."

6. Power to appointment Teachers in the Universities is vested in the Executive Council of the University as per the provisions contained in Section 21(vii) of the Act, 1973. In terms of Section 49 of the Act, 1973, the Statutes can be framed for providing the minimum qualification and experience for the appointment of Teachers of the University and also those of affiliated and associated Colleges. Section 50 of the Act, 1973 provides the procedure for framing the First Statutes of the University. As per the Scheme of the Act, 1973, the power to frame, amend, vary or rescind the First Statutes is primarily vested in the Executive Council of a University, however, Sub-Section (6) permits the State Government to make certain Statutes on certain subjects with the assent of Hon'ble

              Click Here to Read the rest of this document
              1
              2
              3
              4
              5
              6
              7
              8
              9
              10
              11
              SupremeToday Portrait Ad
              supreme today icon
              logo-black

              An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

              Please visit our Training & Support
              Center or Contact Us for assistance

              qr

              Scan Me!

              India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

              For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

              whatsapp-icon Back to top