IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, JJ.
Dr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma - Petitioner
Versus
Chancellor Chaudhary Charan Singh University Meerut and Ors. - Respondents
Writ - A No. 13842 of 2021
Decided On : 13-04-2023
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - U.P. State Universities Act, 1973 - Section 68, 21(vii), 49, 50, (6) - UGC Regulations, 2010 - Regulation 4.4.7 B (ii) - NCTE Regulations, 2014 - Regulation 6.2 B(iv) - Post of Associate Professor - Ineligible for appointment - Minimum eligibility - Assails validity of an Order - Petitioner assails validity of an Order by respondent No.6 challenging appointment of petitioner on post of Associate Professor in Education in University has been allowed and he has been held to be ineligible for appointment ot post in question. [Para 20]
Finding of the Court: Court observe that only reason indicated by Hon'ble Chancellor for holding that petitioner did not fulfill requisite qualification for being considered for appointment to post of Associate Professor is that though he did have eight years teaching experience, however, he did not have three years experience of teaching at M.Ed. level - However, Statute of First Statutes inserted by means of State Government Notification appears to have lost sight of by Hon'ble the Chancellor while passing order impugned before court - It is also not in dispute that NCTE Regulations 2014 are applicable for reason that advertisement in this case was issued in year - Relevant Regulation of NCTE Regulation, 2014, namely, Regulation 6.2 B (iv) has already been discussed above, which uses word 'or' and thus, any candidate fulfilling requisite qualification prescribed either by UGC or by State Government, in court considered opinion, will have the minimum eligibility for being considered for appointment to post of Associate Professor in Faculty of Education in University – Court is convinced that order passed by Hon'ble Chancellor is not sustainable.
Result: Petition allowed.
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Chandra Bhushan Pandey and Ms. Akansha Rajput for the petitioner, Sri Himanshu Suryavanshi for the Chancellor, Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Meerut [here-in-after referred to as 'the University'], learned State Counsel representing the State authorities and Subhash Bisaria, learned Counsel representing the authorities of the University.
2. Though service of this petition upon respondent No.6, as reported vide office note dated 01.10.2021 is sufficient, however neither the respondent No.6 nor anyone representing her is present.
3. By instituting these proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner assails the validity of an Order dated 03.03.2021 passed by the Hon'ble Chancellor of the University, whereby the Reference made under Section 68 of the U.P. State Universities Act, 1973 (here-in-after referred to as 'the Act, 1973') by the respondent No.6 challenging the appointment of the petitioner on the post of Associate Professor in Education in the University has been allowed and he has been held to be ineligible for appointment ot the post in question. The Hon'ble Chancellor has further directed the Executive Council of the University which is the Appointing Authority of the Teachers in the University to take further action. Pursuant to the said order of the Hon'ble Chancellor dated 03.03.2021, the Executive Council in its resolution passed on 15.03.2021 has terminated the services of the petitioner on the post of Associate Professor in the University. The petitioner has also challenged the order of relieving dated 16.0.2021 which has been passed pursuant to the resolution of the Executive Council of the University dated 15.03.2021.
4. The sole issue for consideration before this Court in this case is, as to whether in terms of the Rules regulating the appointment on the post of Associate Professor in the University, the petitioner was possessed with the minimum eligibility or not.
5. An Advertisement bearing No.2/20217 was issued by the University inviting applications for recruitment to various teaching posts in the University including the post of Associate Professor in Education, which was unreserved. Clause - 5 of the advertisement stipulated that the qualification for recruitment to the posts as advertised shall be as per the First Statutes of the University as amended by the Government Notification dated 12.12.2013 (This date is wrongly mentioned. As a matter of fact, the date of the Government Notification is 03.12.2013). Clause 5 further provides that details of qualification and other relevant provisions for recruitment are given at page - 2 to 4 of the advertisement and further that the University reserves the right to amend qualification as per the latest laws in force. Clause - 5 of the Advertisement is extracted here-in-below:-
6. Power to appointment Teachers in the Universities is vested in the Executive Council of the University as per the provisions contained in Section 21(vii) of the Act, 1973. In terms of Section 49 of the Act, 1973, the Statutes can be framed for providing the minimum qualification and experience for the appointment of Teachers of the University and also those of affiliated and associated Colleges. Section 50 of the Act, 1973 provides the procedure for framing the First Statutes of the University. As per the Scheme of the Act, 1973, the power to frame, amend, vary or rescind the First Statutes is primarily vested in the Executive Council of a University, however, Sub-Section (6) permits the State Government to make certain Statutes on certain subjects with the assent of Hon'ble
Qualifications - UGC has prescribed minimum eligibility qualification for appointment of Assistant Professor (PG) in English and notification/advertisement was issued prescribing minimum eligibility ....
Timely submission of academic qualifications and publications is essential for faculty promotions under UGC regulations; delays in challenges to university decisions can invalidate claims.
While making appointments, Universities are bound by stipulations of UGC Regulations and cannot travel beyond it, even if respective State Legislations or Regulations are to speak to contrary.
The importance of meeting the minimum educational qualification and experience criteria laid down by the respondent-University for the appointment of Vice Chancellor.
The UGC Regulations-2010, while important, are not mandatory for all universities and higher educational institutions, and the expertise of the search committee in making selections is crucial.
Judgment affirms the necessity of due process in employment, emphasizing that failure to provide a hearing before termination violates natural justice. UGC regulations' retrospective application prot....
Appointment as Vice-Chancellor of University – Post of Vice-Chancellor of University is a very important post and most meritorious person should be appointed as Vice-Chancellor of University from and....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.