IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
VIPIN SANGHI, RAKESH THAPLIYAL, JJ.
Vinod Kumar Chauhan – Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and Others – Respondents
Writ Petition (S/B) No. 567 of 2021
Decided On : 05-07-2023
quo warranto - Uttarakhand Ayurved University - Uttarakhand Ayurved University Act, 2009, Section 11 - The court discussed the applicability of UGC Regulations, 2018 to the respondent-University and the minimum qualification and experience criteria for the appointment of Vice Chancellor. The court emphasized the importance of meeting the minimum educational qualification and experience criteria laid down by the respondent-University and the purpose of the Corrigendum in bringing the advertisement in tune with the Act. The court rejected the claim that the Corrigendum completely substituted the original advertisement and declared that the Vice Chancellor did not fulfill the minimum educational requirement and experience criteria, leading to the decision to divest him from the post.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought a writ of quo warranto against the Vice Chancellor and Registrar of Uttarakhand Ayurved University, alleging non-compliance with the UGC Regulations, 2018 and failure to meet the minimum qualification and experience criteria for the post of Vice Chancellor.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Vice Chancellor did not fulfill the minimum educational requirement and experience criteria laid down by the respondent-University for the appointment to the post of Vice Chancellor.
Issues: Applicability of UGC Regulations, 2018 to the respondent-University, interpretation of the advertisement/press note, and fulfillment of minimum qualification and experience criteria for the appointment of Vice Chancellor.
Ratio Decidendi: The respondent-University was empowered to lay down minimum educational and experience criteria for the appointment of Vice Chancellor, and the Vice Chancellor did not meet the minimum qualification and experience criteria laid down by the respondent-University.
Final Decision: The court allowed the Writ Petition and declared that the Vice Chancellor is not entitled to hold the post, divesting him from the position with immediate effect.
JUDGMENT :
VIPIN SANGHI, J.
1. The petitioner has preferred the present Writ Petition to seek a writ of quo warranto against respondent nos. 3 and 4, who were, at the time of filing of the present Writ Petition, serving as the Vice Chancellor, and Registrar of the Uttarakhand Ayurved University, Harrawala, Dehradun. Since then, respondent no. 4 has ceased to be the Registrar of the said University. Consequently, so far as this Writ Petition qua respondent no. 4 is concerned, it has become infructuous.
2. The case of the petitioner is that the respondent-University is a State University, constituted under the Uttarakhand Ayurved University Act, 2009 (for short “the 2009 Act”). Section 11 of the 2009 Act provides for appointment and tenure of the Vice Chancellor. The petitioner claims that the respondent-University is bound to comply with Regulation 7.3 of the UGC Regulations on Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and Other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education, 2018 (for short “UGC Regulations, 2018”), framed by the UGC.
3. On the other hand, the stand of the respondents is that the UGC Regulations, 2018 are not applicable to the respondent-University, for the reason that it is a State University, constituted under a State enactment, and it is not a centrally funded University.
4. On this aspect, we find merit in the submission of the respondents, that the respondent- University is not, per se, bound to follow the UGC Regulations, 2018, as the respondent-University is a State University, and it does not receive any aid from the Central Government. This conclusion, however, is not dispositive of the present Writ Petition. We, accordingly, proceed to consider the further issues relating to the challenge to the continuation of respondent no. 3 in office.
5. Respondent no. 2 issued an advertisement/press note dated 30.01.2020, inviting applications for the post of Vice Chancellor, Uttarakhand Ayurved University, Dehradun. The said advertisement/press note reads as follows:
Curriculum vitae from distinguished scholars, academicians of repute, a visionary with excellent leadership quality having highest level of competence, Integrity, morals and institutional commitment in the field of ayurved education, with a minimum of ten years of experience as Professor in a University system or ten years experience in a equivalent position in a reputed research and or academic administrative organization are invited for consideration for appointment to the post of Vice-Chancellor, Uttarakhand Ayurved University, Dehradun. Maximum age at the time of recommendation by search committee shall not be more than 65 years. The term shall for a period of three years from the date of joining.
The Curriculum vitae should be sent to the office of the undersigned by registered/speed post so as to reach the office by 15th February 2020 for placement before the search committee. The details of documents required are available on its website www.au.ac.in.”
6. A corrigendum was issued to the said advertisement/press note on 20.02.2020, which reads as follows:
(Corrigendum)
The Advertisement No-259/XL-1/2020-149/2010 T.CII Dated 30 January 2020 published in daily newspapers on 30 January 2020 for the post of Vice-Chancellor should be read as "Curriculum vitae from renowned Ayush educationists or retired officers from higher level suitable to hold the post of Vice-Chancellor, showing their educational and Specific administrative experience are invited for consideration for appointment to the post of Vice Chancellor, Uttarakhand Ayurved University, Dehradun Maximum age at the time of recommendation by search committee shall not be more than 65 years. The term shall for a period of three years from the date of joining.
The Curriculum vitae should be sent to the offi
The importance of meeting the minimum educational qualification and experience criteria laid down by the respondent-University for the appointment of Vice Chancellor.
The UGC Regulations-2010, while important, are not mandatory for all universities and higher educational institutions, and the expertise of the search committee in making selections is crucial.
Appointment as Vice-Chancellor of University – Post of Vice-Chancellor of University is a very important post and most meritorious person should be appointed as Vice-Chancellor of University from and....
The UGC Regulations, 2018 prevail over the conflicting provisions of the concerned State Universities Act relating to the appointment of the Vice-Chancellor.
Courts must exercise judicial restraint in academic appointments, deferring to the expertise of validly constituted selection committees. Administrative-academic roles involving research guidance and....
The appointment of Vice-Chancellors must comply with statutory provisions and UGC regulations, ensuring lawful and independent decision-making by the Chancellor.
First choice in Section 13(7) of “Act” is Vice Chancellor of any other University in Kerala; and admittedly, all such persons are fully qualified in terms of both experience and educational qualifica....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.