HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Alok Sharma Son Of Shri Raju Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Sanskrit Education, Secretariat, Jaipur – Respondent
ORDER :
ASHOK KUMAR JAIN, J.
1. Instant Writ Petition is preferred by writ petitioner under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking quashing of the impugned order dated 24.05.2025 whereby the services of petitioner as Lecturer (Jyotish-Ganit) is terminated by respondents in violation of principles of natural justice and in complete violation of applicable statutory rules and regulations.
2. The petitioner has filed the writ petition with following prayer:-
(i) To quash and set aside the impugned termination order dated 24.052025 and the consequential relieving order dated 24.05.2025 issued by the respondents;
(ii) To direct the respondents to reinstate the Petitioner to his post as Lecturer Jyotish (Ganit), with all consequential benefits including continuity of service, arrears of salary, and all other service related dues;
3. Learned counsel for petitioner while placing reliance upon grounds of writ petition submitted that in pursuant to advertisement issued by RPSC for recruitment on post of Lecturer (Jyotish-Ganit), the petitioner was selected and ultimately appointed by order dated 22.10.2005 (Annexure-2) by the Directorate, Sanskrit Education, Rajasthan, Jaipur. He further sub
Dr. M.S. Mudhol and Anr. Vs. S.B. Halegkar and Ors.
Kerala and Ors. Vs. Merlin J.N. & Anr.
Dr. M.S. Mudhol & Anr. Vs. S.D. Halegkar & Ors.
Nayagarh Cooperative Central Bank Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Narayan Rath & Anr.
agdish Prasad & Ors. Vs. State of Bihar and Ors.
Rajendra Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
Sushil Kumar Tripathi Vs. Jagadguru Ram Bharachara Handicapped University & Anr.
Sanjay Dadhich Vs. State of Rajasthan 7 Ors.
Ashwani Kumar and Ors. Vs. State of Haryana and Ors.
Satwati Deshwal Vs. State of Haryana and Ors.
Kamal Narayan Mishra Vs. State of madhya Pradesh and Ors.
Mazharul Islam Hashmi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh 7 Ors.
State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Manoj Sharma
Shipping Corporation of India Ltd. Vs. Machado Brothers and Ors.
Judgment affirms the necessity of due process in employment, emphasizing that failure to provide a hearing before termination violates natural justice. UGC regulations' retrospective application prot....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the retrospective application of the 2016 UGCR to protect Dr. Jayakumar's appointment as Lecturer in Sociology by the University.
Qualifications for lecturer appointments must be met at the time of appointment, and later-acquired qualifications do not retroactively qualify an individual.
The denial of UGC scale of pay from the date of regularization based on unjust conditions is discriminatory, violating equal treatment under Article 14.
Qualifications - UGC has prescribed minimum eligibility qualification for appointment of Assistant Professor (PG) in English and notification/advertisement was issued prescribing minimum eligibility ....
Eligibility for regularization and pension is contingent upon meeting the prescribed qualifications at the time of appointment and undergoing a selection process.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.