VIVEK KUMAR BIRLA, SURENDRA SINGH I
Neetu – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SURENDRA SINGH-I, J.
1. Heard Sri Sanjay Kr. Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Mithilesh Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the informant and Sri G.P. Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The present writ petition has been preferred with the prayer to quash the impugned first information report dated 17.02.2023 registered as Case Crime No. 77 of 2023 under Sections 366 I.P.C. Police Station-Rasulpur, District-Firozabad and for a direction to the respondents not to arrest or harass the petitioner no. 2, Suraj in pursuance of the impugned first information report.
3. According to prosecution case, informant Shyam Sundar's wife, Neetu, is the resident of Tea-Huts No. 2296, Sonia Camp, G.T. Road, Jhilmil Industrial Area, near Dilshan Garden, Metro Station, Shahdara, Old Delhi. On 12.02.2023 at 1.30 p.m. informant's younger brother dropped Neetu along with her two sons, namely, Sangam, aged 8 years and Sushank, aged 6 years on bus at Asafabad Chauraha for Agra. Since then, the whereabouts of Neetu is not known. The informant's wife, Neetu was in love affair for a long duration with petitioner no. 2, Suraj, resident of Shahdara, old Delhi, who was posted as Ho
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.