Back
DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, SUBHASH VIDYARTHI
Alpsankhyak Shiksha Vikas Samiti, Kanpur Thru. Dr. Zamir Ahmed – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. , Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Ayush Govt. of U. P. Civil Secrt. Lko. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Our jurisdiction under Chapter VIII Rule 5 of the Allahabad High Court Rules has been invoked to question the legality and validity of the order dated 03.03.2023 passed by learned Single Judge in Writ C No. 1747 of 2023. By the said order learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition which was filed with a prayer for quashing the order passed by the National Commission for Indian System of Medicine (hereinafter referred to as the ''Commission'), dated 02.03.2023 whereby the prayer of the appellants-petitioners for reducing the percentile criteria for admission to undergraduate B.U.M.S. and B.A.M.S. courses based on NEET 2022 has been refused and further, the request for extending the date of counseling for the purposes of said admission has also not been acceded to.
2. Heard Sri Rajat Rajan Singh, Sri Vidhu Bhushan Kalia and Sri. Adarsh Saxena Advocates, the learned counsel representing the appellants-petitioners and Sri Asit Chaturvedi, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Devak Vardhan Advocate for the Commission, Sri Shailendra Kumar Singh, learned Chief Standing Counsel assisted by Sri Nishant Shukla, learned Standing Counsel representing the State of UP,
: If the criteria for minimum percentile is further reduced, this Court is doubtful about the standard of the students taking admission and is wary of their potential to undertake the professional co....
The court emphasized the importance of maintaining high standards in AYUSH education and the expertise of NCISM in making policy decisions. It also highlighted the potential risk of compromising medi....
Merely because interim orders have been passed which were adinterim exparte orders without the benefit of the arguments of the other side on the basis of the replies filed and the pleadings, such int....
Discretion under regulations for educational admissions must be exercised considering only pertinent factors, and the Union's refusal to further lower NEET percentile requirements was lawful given th....
The discretion vested by Regulation 2(d) is applicable in a situation where there are insufficient candidates in the respective categories who have scored the minimum marks in the NEET. Interference ....
The court upheld the minimum percentile requirement for postgraduate medical admissions, asserting the importance of maintaining high educational standards in medical education, which cannot be compr....
(1) Judicial review of administrative action is permissible on grounds of illegality, irrationality and procedural impropriety – An administrative decision is flawed if it is illegal.(2) If reducing ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
