IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW
Om Prakash Shukla, J.
C/M Dr. Abdul Ali Tibbiya College And Hospital,Lko. Thru. Director Prof. Dr.Arshad Ali And Others - Petitioner
Vs.
State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Ayush, Lko. And Others - Respondent
Writ-C Nos. 9920 of 2023 and 10640 of 2023
Decided On : 22-02-2024
NEET UG - AYUSH Admissions - NCISM Act, 2020, Regulation 5 (2) - 2021-22 NEET UG 2021 for AYUSH Courses, 2020-21 NEET UG 2020 for AYUSH Courses, 2022-23 NEET PG 2022 for MDS Courses, 2020-21 NEET PG - The court dismissed the petitions seeking to lower the minimum percentile for AYUSH admissions for the academic session 2023-24, as the National Commission for Indian System of Medicine (NCISM) had already lowered the minimum percentile by 5% across all categories, increasing the number of eligible candidates. The court emphasized the importance of maintaining high standards in AYUSH education and the expertise of NCISM in making policy decisions. It also highlighted the potential risk of compromising medical standards and the need to avoid half-baked doctors. The court urged NCISM to consider framing a policy to address the perennial problem of vacant AYUSH seats while maintaining education standards.
Fact of the Case:
The petitions sought to lower the minimum percentile of NEET UG 2023-24 for admission in AYUSH Courses (BAMS & BUMS) due to vacant seats in AYUSH colleges. The National Commission for Indian System of Medicine (NCISM) had already lowered the minimum percentile by 5% across all categories, increasing the number of eligible candidates. The petitioners argued that the lowering of the percentile should correspond to the vacancies in their colleges.
Finding of the Court:
The court dismissed the petitions, stating that no further lowering of the minimum percentile was possible as it would frustrate the purpose of maintaining the standard of education in AYUSH. The court emphasized the importance of maintaining high standards in AYUSH education and the expertise of NCISM in making policy decisions. It also highlighted the potential risk of compromising medical standards and the need to avoid half-baked doctors. The court urged NCISM to consider framing a policy to address the perennial problem of vacant AYUSH seats while maintaining education standards.
Issues: The main issue was whether the court should lower the minimum percentile for AYUSH admissions for the academic session 2023-24 due to vacant seats in AYUSH colleges.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that no further lowering of the minimum percentile was possible as it would frustrate the purpose of maintaining the standard of education in AYUSH. The court emphasized the importance of maintaining high standards in AYUSH education and the expertise of NCISM in making policy decisions. It also highlighted the potential risk of compromising medical standards and the need to avoid half-baked doctors.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the petitions seeking to lower the minimum percentile for AYUSH admissions for the academic session 2023-24, emphasizing the importance of maintaining high standards in AYUSH education and the expertise of NCISM in making policy decisions. The court urged NCISM to consider framing a policy to address the perennial problem of vacant AYUSH seats while maintaining education standards.
JUDGMENT :
Om Prakash Shukla, J.
1. Heard Shri Rajat Rajan Singh learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Vijay Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent, Shri Umesh Singh, learned counsel for respondent No.2 and Shri Devak Vardhan learned counsel for respondent No.3.
2. The above-captioned petitions came to be filed by the various Committee of Management of Ayurvedic and Unani Colleges in the State of Uttar Pradesh, primarily seeking filling of the vacant seats of their institutions by lowering the minimum percentile of National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (Undergraduate) (hereinafter referred to as ‘NEET UG’) 2023-24 declared for admission in AYUSH UG Courses i.e. Bachelor of Ayurvedic Medicine & Surgery (in short ‘BAMS’) and Bachelor of Unani Medicine & Surgery (in short ‘BUMS’). These petitioners have also sought for extension of time for the last date of admission for these AYUSH UG Courses, wherein Writ-C No. 9920 of 2023 (Committee of Management, Dr. Abdul Ali Tibbiya College & Hospital & Others Vs State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.) have been filed by almost seven Ayurvedic & Unani Institutions and Writ-C No. 10640 of 2023 has been filed by the Committee of Management, Sahararanpur Ayurvedic Medical College.
3. Since common issue is engaging attention of this Court, wherein both these petitions have been filed, praying for lowering of the minimum percentile of NEET UG 2023-24 for admission in AYUSH Courses by 10% and 15%, respectively, for the session 2023-24, both these petitions have been heard together and as such are being disposed of by this common judgment.
4. However, in order to appreciate the issue in its right perspective, the facts of Writ-C No. 9920 of 2023 is being curled out as a narrative to the present issue.
5. In the said petition, it has been submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioners that petitioners No.1 to 7, except petitioner No.6, are Unani Medical Colleges and are duly approved by the National Commission for Indian System of Medicine (hereinafter referred to as ‘NCISM’) for imparting BUMS Course for the academic year 2023-24, whereas petitioner No.6 has been approved for BAMS for the said session. It has been contended that vide Government Order dated 18.08.2023, the State Government had notified for conducting counselling for BAMS and BUMS Courses on the basis of NEET UG 2023-24, wherein it was proposed to conduct four rounds of counselling i.e first, second, third and stray vacancy round for the filling up the seats of the institutions. Further, a list of participating institutions was also issued on 12.09.2023, which was updated on 26.10.2023 and the petitioners has contended that the counselling for academic session 2023-24 was held in the following manner :-
| Stage of Counselling | Start date | End Date |
| First round of Counselling | 08.09.2023 | 25.09.2023 |
| Second round of Counselling | 03.10.2023 | 10.10.2023 |
| Third round of Counselling | 26.10.2023 | 30.10.2023 |
| Stray round of Counselling | 03.11.2023 | 07.11.2023 |
itioners that although the stray round of counselling ended on 07.11.2023, however, the last date of admission for AYUSH Courses stood extended till 20.11.2023 by the NCISM. The hinge of the argument of the learned Counsel is that even after the conduct of four rounds of counselling, large numbers of seats are still vacant in these institutions and has, thus, sought for lowering the minimum percentile for AYUSH admissions by 10% for the current academic session 2023-24. The learned Counsel has tried to draw an analogy with the decision dated 20.09.2023 taken by the Central Government for PG Courses (Medical/Dental), wherein the Government taking cognizance of the fact that large number of PG seats were vacant, has reduced the minimum qualifying percentile to “zero” across all categories. Thus, it has been contended by the learned Counsel that although Medical/Dental Course are more specialized, superior,
Modern Dental College & Research Centre v. State of Madhya Pradesh : (2016) 7 SCC 353
The court emphasized the importance of maintaining high standards in AYUSH education and the expertise of NCISM in making policy decisions. It also highlighted the potential risk of compromising medi....
: If the criteria for minimum percentile is further reduced, this Court is doubtful about the standard of the students taking admission and is wary of their potential to undertake the professional co....
The discretion vested by Regulation 2(d) is applicable in a situation where there are insufficient candidates in the respective categories who have scored the minimum marks in the NEET. Interference ....
Discretion under regulations for educational admissions must be exercised considering only pertinent factors, and the Union's refusal to further lower NEET percentile requirements was lawful given th....
The court emphasized the need for balanced admission policies to fill vacancies in Homoeopathy colleges without compromising educational standards, recommending criteria for effective implementation ....
Merely because interim orders have been passed which were adinterim exparte orders without the benefit of the arguments of the other side on the basis of the replies filed and the pleadings, such int....
The court upheld the minimum percentile requirement for postgraduate medical admissions, asserting the importance of maintaining high educational standards in medical education, which cannot be compr....
(1) Judicial review of administrative action is permissible on grounds of illegality, irrationality and procedural impropriety – An administrative decision is flawed if it is illegal.(2) If reducing ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.