IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Satish Chandra Sharma, Subramonium Prasad, JJ.
Abhinav Kumar, Dr. & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
Union Of India, Through Secretary, Ministry Of Health And Family Welfare & Anr. - Respondents
W.P.(C) 4852/2020 & CM Appl. 5299/2021, CM Appl. 41013/2021
Decided On : 29-07-2022
JUDGMENT
Satish Chandra Sharma, CJ. - The Petitioner before this Court has filed the present petition under Article 226 read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India, for quashment of Regulation 9(3) of the Postgraduate Medical Education (Amendment) Regulations, 2018 (as amended on 05.04.2018) to the extent that it provides for minimum marks of 50th percentile as a mandatory requirement for admission to postgraduate courses, on the ground that the said requirement is arbitrary, unjustified and contrary to Article 14, Article 19 (1)(g) and Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
2. The facts of the case reveal that the petition has been filed as a Public Interest Litigation by three doctors seeking admission into postgraduate courses. The Petitioner No. 1 obtained his MBBS Degree in the year 2018 and appeared in the NEET PG Entrance Test on 05.01.2020. He secured 180 marks in the NEET PG Entrance Test, and is working at GB Pant Hospital. The Petitioner No. 2 obtained his MBBS Degree in June 2018 and, thereafter, appeared in the NEET PG Entrance Test, scoring 108 marks. Similarly, the Petitioner No. 3 also appeared in the NEET PG Entrance Test and scored 160 marks. He is also working at GB Pant Hospital.
3. The Petitioners' contention is that the Medical Council of India (MCI) introduced an All-India Entrance Examination called as National Eligibility-cum Entrance Test (NEET) for admission to MBBS and postgraduate courses by amending the Post-Graduate Medical Education Regulations on 21.12.2010. The Post-Graduate Medical Education Regulations were again amended on 15.02.2012, and the percentile system was introduced which provided that in order to obtain admission to a postgraduate course in an academic year, a student must obtain minimum marks at 50th Percentile in the NEET.
4. The Petitioners' further contention is that the amending Regulation was challenged before the Hon'ble Supreme Court by some institutions and, in the case of Christian Medical College , Vellore and Others v. Union of India and Others , (2014) 2 SCC 305 , the Regulations were held to be ultra vires. It has further been submitted that again in the case of Medical Council of India v. Christian Medical College, Vellore and Others , (2016) 4 SCC 342 , the Hon'ble Supreme Court rendered a decision holding that the judgment delivered in Christian Medical College , Vellore (supra) needed to be reviewed and that the process of admissions based on All-India Examination for common merit list for admission to medical colleges was in order.
5. The Petitioners further stated that in the year 2016, the Indian MEDICAL COUNCIL ACT , 1956 was amended by Indian Medical Council (Amendment) Act, 2016, and the amending Act inserted Section 10D and Section 33(mb) into the Indian MEDICAL COUNCIL ACT , 1956. The statutory provisions brought into force by way of amendment, provided for a uniform entrance examination to all medical educational institutions in respect of under-graduate courses as well as postgraduate courses to be held by the designated authority.
6. The Petitioners have further brought to the notice of this Court that keeping in view the Indian Medical Council (Amendment) Act, 2016, an all-India examination took place for the academic year 2017-18, and on 05.04.2018, the Medical Council of India, with the previous sanction of the Central Government, amended the Post-Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 2000, vide notification No. MCI-18(1)/ 2018-Med./100818. The amended Regulation 9(3), which came into force on 05.04.2018, reads as under:
"(3) To be eligible for admission to Postgraduate Course for an academic year, it shall be necessary for a candidate to obtain minimum of marks at 50th percentile in the 'National Eligibility-Cum-Entrance Test for Postgraduate courses' held for the said academic year. However, in respect of candidates belonging to Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and Other Backward Classes, the minimum marks shall be at 40th percentile. In re
A.P. Christians Medical Educational Society vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh & Anr.
Ajay Kumar Singh vs. State of Bihar (1994) 4 SCC 401
Ambesh Kumar(Dr.) V. Principal, LLRM Medical College, Meerut & Ors.
Ashish Ranjan & Ors. V. Union of India & Ors.
Association of Managements of Homeopathic Medical Colleges of Maharashtra vs. Union of India & Ors.
BSNL vs. Telecom Regulatory Authority of India
BharatiVidyapeeth (deemed university) and Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
CBSE and Anr. vs. P Sunil Kumar & Ors.
Cellular Operators Assn. of India vs. Telecom Regulatory Authority of India
Christian Medical College, Vellore and Others vs. Union of India and Others
Christian Medical College Vellore Association vs. Medical Council of India and Others.
Dental Council of India vs. Biyani Shikshan Samiti and Another
District Registrar and Collector, Hyderabad and Another vs. Canara Bank and Others
Dr. Narayan Sharma & Anr. V. Dr. Pankaj Kr. Lehkar & Ors.
Dr. Preeti Srivastava vs. State of M.P. & Ors
Government of India vs. Citedal Fine Pharmaceuticals, Madras & Ors.
Harish Verma & Ors. V. Ajay Srivastava & Anr
Harshit Agarwal & Ors vs. Union of India and Others
Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) (P) Ltd. vs. Union of India
Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Private Limited and Others vs. Union of India and Others
Kerala Samsthana Chethu Thozilali Union vs. State of Kerala & Ors.
Krishna Priya Ganguly & Ors. vs. University of Lucknow & Ors.
Kunj Behari Lal Butail & Ors. V. State of H.P. & Ors.
Medical Council of India V. State of Karnataka and Ors., (1998) 6 SCC 131
Medical Council of India vs. Christian Medical College, Vellore and Others
Medical Council of India vs. Rama Medical College Hospital & Research Centre
Medical Council of India vs. State of Karnataka and Others
Modern Dental College & Research Centre and Others vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others,
Neelu Arora (Ms.) and Another vs. Union of India and Others.
Sant Singh Nalwa & Anr. V. Financial Commissioner
Saurabh Chaudri (Dr.) & Ors vs. Union of India & Ors
State of Kerala vs. Kumari T.P. Roshana and Another
State of Kerala vs. T.P. Roshana (1979) 1 SCC 572
State of MP & Ors. V. Gopal D. Tirthani & Ors.
State of Punjab vs. Dayanand Medical College and Hospital and Others
State of T.N. and Another vs. P. Krishnamurthy and Others
State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. V. Dinesh Singh Chauhan
Sudhir N and Ors.. V. State of Kerala and Ors.
Supreet Batra & Others. vs. Union of India & Ors.
Tulsipur Sugar Co. Ltd. vs. Notified Area Committee
U.P. State Electricity Board vs. Abdul Sakoor Hashmi & Ors
Union of India V. Federation of Self-Financed Ayurvedic College, Punjab & Others
Veterinary Council of India vs. Indian Council of Agricultural Research
Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) (P) Ltd. vs. Union of India
Ramesh Chandra Kachardas Porwal vs. State of Maharashtra
Shri Sitaram Sugar Co. Ltd. vs. Union of India
St. Johns Teachers Training Institute vs. NCTE
State of Haryana vs. Ram Kishan
The court upheld the minimum percentile requirement for postgraduate medical admissions, asserting the importance of maintaining high educational standards in medical education, which cannot be compr....
: If the criteria for minimum percentile is further reduced, this Court is doubtful about the standard of the students taking admission and is wary of their potential to undertake the professional co....
Merely because interim orders have been passed which were adinterim exparte orders without the benefit of the arguments of the other side on the basis of the replies filed and the pleadings, such int....
Discretion under regulations for educational admissions must be exercised considering only pertinent factors, and the Union's refusal to further lower NEET percentile requirements was lawful given th....
The discretion vested by Regulation 2(d) is applicable in a situation where there are insufficient candidates in the respective categories who have scored the minimum marks in the NEET. Interference ....
Admission regulations for homeopathy postgraduate courses must comply with statutory procedures; deviations are not permissible, especially post cut-off date.
Admissions to BDS courses granted under relaxed percentile criteria by the State were illegal, emphasizing that only the Central Government holds the authority to set qualifying standards for NEET.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.