J. J. MUNIR
Jyoti – Appellant
Versus
Ankit Dubey – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
This civil revision is directed against an order of Smt. Renu Singh, Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Etawah dated May the 31st, 2022, allowing the respondent's application, seeking amendment to his petition for divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short, 'the HMA').
2. A petition under Section 13 of HMA was instituted by the sole respondent, Ankit Dubey against the revisionist, Smt. Jyoti Dubey before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Agra, which was numbered on the file of the Principal Judge, Family Court, aforesaid as HM Petition No.291 of 2017. A decree for divorce was sought on the ground of cruelty.
3. It appears that the wife, who is a resident of Etawah, has secured a transfer of proceedings from the Principal Judge, Family Court, Agra to the Family Court at Etawah. The petition for divorce as aforesaid is pending before the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Etawah. This fact is not stated on record, but that is the only logical conclusion to be drawn considering that the proceedings commenced before the Family Court, Agra and are now pending at Etawah, where the revisionist-wife resides.
4. Pending the divorce petition, th
Sudhanshu Gupta v. Komal Gupta
Major Raja P. Singh v. Smt. Surendra Kumari
Yogish Arora v. Smt. Jennette Yogish Arora @ Miss Jennettee Dsouza
Object of Special Law of Family Courts Act is to decide matrimonial cases in a speedy manner.
An order rejecting an amendment application is an interlocutory order and not appealable under Section 19 of the Family Court Act, as it does not decide substantive rights.
Family Courts exercise civil jurisdiction for certain matters and criminal jurisdiction for proceedings under S.125 Cr.P.C., reflecting distinct legal frameworks.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of filing a certified copy of the decree along with the memorandum of appeal, and the court's consideration of the maintainability ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the order of interim maintenance under Section 125 of Cr.P.C is an interlocutory order and hence not appealable under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C o....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.