SURENDRA SINGH I
Phool Chandra – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Sri R.P. Singh Parihar, learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. This criminal appeal has been instituted against the judgement and order dated 20.10.1995 passed by IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Fatehpur, in Sessions Trial No. 508 of 1990, State Vs. Deshraj Singh and others, arising out of Case Crime No. 91 of 1988 u/s 395/397/412 and connected Sessions Trial No. 286 of 1995, State Vs. Phool Chandra, arising out of Case Crime No. 94 of 1988 under Section 25 of Arms Act, P.S.-Jafarganj, District-Fatehpur. The trial court convicted and sentenced co-accused Deshraj Singh Thakur, Shiv Kumar Yadav and Lakhan Lal under Section 380 IPC. They were acquitted from the charge under Section 395 IPC. The trial court convicted appellant accused Phool Chandra under Section 411 IPC and sentenced him two years rigorous imprisonment. The trial court acquitted Phool Chandra from the charge under Sections 395 and 412 IPC. The trial court also acquitted appellant accused under Section 25 of the Arms Act. There is no criminal appeal filed by the State or informant against acquittal of appellant-accused u/s 395 IPC and 25 Arms Act. Thus, the trial court’s or
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.