SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 328

KAUSHAL JAYENDRA THAKER, ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL
Hasmuddin – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Arvind Agrawal, Dileep Kumar, M.A. Siddiqui
For the Respondent: Rahul Chaudhary, S.P.S.Rathi

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri M.A. Siddiqui, learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. Present criminal appeal challenges judgment and order dated 05.02.2010 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.4, District Firozabad in Sessions Trial No.424 of 2006 (State vs Hasmuddin) in connection with Case Crime No. 26 of 2006, Police Station-Ramgarh, District Firozabad, whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge has convicted the accused-appellant, Hasmuddin for commission of offence under Section 304B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'IPC') and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life, under Section 498-A to undergo two years rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs.500/-and under Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year with fine of Rs.500/-in default of payment of fine further one year’s additional imprisonment. All the sentences shall run concurrently.

3. Brief facts as culled out from the record are that the accused-appellant was married to the deceased three and half month prior to the incident

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top