PANKAJ BHATIA
Sai Enterprises – Appellant
Versus
Debts Recovery Appellate – Respondent
ORDER :
(Pankaj Bhatia, J.)
1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 03.01.2023 whereby the restoration application filed by the petitioner has been rejected on the ground of limitation.
2. The facts in brief are that the proceedings were initiated by the respondent Bank against the petitioner before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Patna which was decided against the petitioner. Against the order of DRT, Patna, the petitioner preferred an Appeal before the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad, however, the petitioner had not made any deposit along with the appeal as is required under Section 21 of The Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993.
3. From the documents as on record, it appears that the petitioner was granted time to make the deposit, however, he has not deposited which led to the dismissal of the appeal. Subsequently, when the petitioner arranged the funds, he moved an application for deposit of an amount of Rs.20,00,000/-and sought recall of the order dated 21.01.2020 whereby the appeal was dismissed for want of pre-deposit and prayed that the said order be recalled and decided on merit. The said recall application has
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.