SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 649

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SANJAY KUMAR SINGH, J.
Suryansh Kharbanda – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 52326 of 2022
Decided on : 08-05-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr Alok Ranjan, Mr G.S. Chaturvedi
For the Respondent:Mr Shiv Kumar Pal (Government Advocate), Mr O.P. Dwivedi, learned A.G.A (State), Mr Raghuvansh Mishra, Mr Vidit Agarwal and Mr Ashwani Tripathi

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 - Articles 20 and 21 - Indian Penal Code,1860 - Sections 498-A and 306 - Criminal Procedure Code,1973 – Section 161 - Indian Evidence Act - Sections 113-A and 113B - Presumption as to abetment of suicide by a married woman - Abetment of suicide - Dowry death - Lodged a first information report on in respect of the incident which took place against (husband) (mother-in-law) Grover alias allegations that aforesaid accused persons used to demand rupees seventy lac indulged in fight with his daughter and instigate her to commit suicide - Bad character and they also wanted to drag victim in that misdeed - Accused persons with common intention tortured victim physically and mentally and in evening husband of victim after beating her, took her cash and jewelries - Daughter used to telephone him several times a day and tell him about harassment and torture meted out to her by her family members – Held, Investigating officer has not assigned any cogent reason as to why he has not investigated case in respect of complaint made by on Commissioner, U.P. Police, well as in respect provided from accused's side nor recorded transcript of same in case diary. Investigating Officer even did not ask about source and certificate under Section 65B of Evidence Act regarding said video and telephonic conversation available in pen-drive - Offence, evidence, complicity of the accused and submissions of learned counsel for the parties - Bail application is allowed

JUDGMENT :

 

Index

Contents

• Brief Facts.

• Submissions on behalf of accused-applicant

• Submissions on behalf of the State and informant

• Discussion about the case

• Conclusion

• Result

• Observation and Direction in respect of investigation

1. Heard Shri Gopal Swaroop Chaturvedi, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Alok Ranjan, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Shiv Kumar Pal, learned Government Advocate assisted by Shri Om Prakash Dwivedi, learned Additional Government Advocate representing the State and Shri Raghuvansh Mishra, learned counsel along with Shri Vidit Agarwal and Shri Ashwani Tripathi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the first informant.

2. By means of this application under Sections 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, applicant Suryansh Kharbanda, who is involved in Case Crime No. 162 of 2021, under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506, 304-B, 120-B IPC and Section ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act, police station Nazirabad, district Kanpur Nagar, seeks enlargement on bail during the pendency of trial.

3. In short compass the facts of the case are that the informant Pawan Grover, who is the father of Anchal Kharbanda (hereinafter referred as 'the deceased') lodged a first information report on 20.11.2021 in respect of the incident which took place on 19.11.2021 against Suryansh (husband) Nisha (mother-in-law) Bharat Grover alias Kaku (phupha), Minakshi, Annu Khullar (paternal aunt) Puneet Kotwani, (brother-in-law)(Bahnoi) Nikita Kotwani (sister-in-law)(nand) and Tanya Grover with the allegations that the aforesaid accused persons used to demand Rs. 70,00,000/-(rupees seventy lac ) and indulged in fight (Marpeet) with his daughter and instigate her to commit suicide. Suryansh and his mother Nisha are of bad character and they also wanted to drag the victim in that misdeed. On 12.11.2021, all the accused persons with common intention tortured the victim physically and mentally and in the evening Suryansh, husband of the victim after beating her, took her cash and jewelries. The said incident was reported to the police by dialing 112 and 181. The FIR further alleges that her daughter used to telephone him several times a day and tell him about the harassment and torture meted out to her by her family members. On 19.11.2021 when the victim did not make any call, he informed the police by dialing 181 and when he went to the matrimonial house of the victim, he found her daughter dead hanging from the fan. All the aforementioned accused persons with common intention after killing his daughter hanged her from the fan.

4. After getting the information, the police rushed to the spot and conducted inquest proceeding as well as post mortem examination on the body of the deceased.

5. Inquest on the body of the deceased was conducted on 20.11.2021 between 8.30 AM to 11.15 AM, in which Shri Jitendra Bhalla (maternal uncle of the deceased), Shri Rajeev Madan, (Mausa of the deceased) Shri Arun Grover (uncle of the deceased), Shri Akshay (brother of the deceased) and Smt. Reeta Grover (aunt of the deceased) were the witnesses of inquest proceedings.

6. Post mortem on the cadaver was conducted by Doctor Sunil Kumar on 20.11.2021 at 12.55 PM. Doctor found the following ante-mortem injuries:

    “Ligature Mark 29 cm x 3.5 cm around the neck with a gap of 7 cm right side back of neck.

Distance 5.5 cm below chin, 6 cm below left ear and 1.5 cm below right ear.

On dissection white hard and glistering subcutaneous tissue present under the ligature mark.”

7. Shri Gopal Swaroop Chaturvedi, learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits as under:

7.1 Keeping in view the injuries sustained by the deceased, it is a case of hanging and not strangulation.

7.2 There was no mention of any dowry demand in the suicide note, which was given by the father of the deceased to the police on

            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
            1
            2
            3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
            supreme today icon
            logo-black

            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

            Please visit our Training & Support
            Center or Contact Us for assistance

            qr

            Scan Me!

            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

            whatsapp-icon Back to top