JUDGMENT :

RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. Present criminal revision has been preferred against order dated 8.1.2022 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 9, Firozabad, in Crl. Appeal No. 51 of 2021 (Rohit Yadav @ Ravi vs. Smt. Deepika Yadav) as well as order dated 1.11.2021 passed by Nyayadhikari (Judicial Officer), Rural Court Tundla, District Firozabad, in Case No. 367 of 2020, under Sections 12/14/15/17/18/19/20/21/22 Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, P.S. Tundla, District Firozabad. By the impugned order dated 1.11.2021, learned Nyayadhikari/Judicial Magistrate allowed the petition under aforesaid sections filed by petitioner Smt. Deepika Yadav, ex-parte against present revisionists, who were respondent in Case No. 637 of 2020 before court of Nyayadhikari and directed them to pay Rs. 7,000/-as monetory compensation towards fooding, clothing, medical and daily needs of opposite party and her two minor daughters Ishanika and Joshika, aged around 7 years and 3 years respectively, from the time of filing of petition in the year