JUDGMENT :

RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J.

1. Heard Shri Prabhat Kumar Upadhyay, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri A.S. Tewari, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Shri Rakesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for opposite party no. 4.

2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed following main reliefs:

“(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the order dated 18.09.2001 passed by Board of Revenue, U.P. Lucknow in Revision No. 114/ 1993-94 which annexed as Annexure No. 1 to this writ petition.

(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari thereby quashing the order dated 11.08.2022 passed in Review No. 104/ 2005-06 passed by Board of Revenue, U.P. Lucknow which is annexed as Annexure No. 2 to this writ petition.

(iii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Certiorari thereby quashing the order dated 16.06.1994 passed in Appeal No. 9/ 44 passed by Assistant Record Officer, Faizabad which is annexed as Annexure No. 3 to this writ petition.”

3. In the present case, the legal question involved is as to whether any application/ suit/ case etc. is filed beyond the period prescribed unde