SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, JAYANT BANERJI
Kishan Kumar Pathak – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, J.
1. Heard Sri R.K. Ojha, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Sanjay Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Manish Goyal, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Sri Pankaj Rai, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. This writ petition has been filed praying for the following reliefs:
(b) To issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus or other appropriate writ/direction to place the person who is suitable and eligible in accordance with the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (in brevity Act No. II of 1973).
(c) To issue any order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the ci
Ajmer Singh vs. Union of India
Armed Forces Medical Association vs. Union of India
B. Srinivasa Reddy vs. Karnataka Urban Water Supply and Drainage Board Employees' Association
Baleshwar Dass and Others vs. State of U.P. and Others
Bharati Reddy vs. State of Karnataka
Central Electricity Supply Utility of Odisha vs. Dhobei Sahoo
ESI Corporation vs. Mangalam Publication (India) (P) Ltd. (2018) 11 SCC 438
Gambhirdan K Gadhvi vs. State of Gujarat and Others
India Cement Ltd. vs. State of Tamil Nadu
ITC Ltd. vs. Agricultural Produce Market Committee
Jaisri Sahu vs. Rajdewan Dubey
Jayaben vs. Tejas Kanubhai Zala and Another
K. Anbazhagan vs. State of Karnataka and Others
K. Anbazhagan vs. State of Karnataka
Kartar Singh vs. State of Punjab
Km. Shrilekha Vidyarthi and Others vs. State of U.P. and Others
Maru Ram vs. Union of India and Others
National Human Rights Commission vs. State of Gujarat and Others
Official Liquidator vs. Dharti Dhan (P) Ltd. (1977) 2 SCC 166
Rajesh Awasthi vs. Nand Lal Jaiswal
S.B. Shahane and Others vs. State of Maharashtra and Another
Sadhana Sharma vs. State of U.P. and Others
Sub-Inspector Rooplal vs. Lt. Governor
Sukhdev Singh vs. State of Haryana
U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. vs. Rajesh Kumar
Union of India and Others vs. Somasundaram Viswanath and Others
Union of India vs. Hansoli Devi
Union of India vs. Shah Goverdhan L. Kabra Teacher's College
The court ruled that the appointment of the Director of Prosecution is not limited to the prosecution cadre, and the amendments to the rules do not violate the provisions of the Cr.P.C.
The significance of the DPP's autonomy and the specific qualifications required for the appointment to the office of DPP.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the establishment and appointments within the Jammu & Kashmir Prosecution Service were in accordance with the amended provisions of the Code o....
An Assistant Police Prosecuting Officer, not being categorized as a 'Police Officer,' is competent to conduct prosecutions under CrPC Section 25.
The main legal point established is the duty to appoint a Special Public Prosecutor to ensure a fair trial, as well as the duty of the Prosecutor to be impartial and present all material facts before....
Petitioner/Intervener with regard to violation of Rule 16(1) of Rules, 1958 and FR 56(d) and given a detailed finding that there is no violation of the said Rules, in view of the power of relaxation ....
The State Government must conform to statutory procedures when making appointments to public offices to ensure the rule of law is upheld.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.