IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J.
Asif Ahmad Siddiqui – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. and Another – Respondents
Application U/s 482 No. 5500 of 2023
Decided On : 26-04-2023
Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 323, 363, 328, 376, 377, 504, 506 - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482, 319, 164, 190, 161 - Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act - Section 5, 6 - Appeal - Offence of Rape - Quashing criminal proceedings - Sexual Offence - Held, Court clarify that judgment is purely tentative limited purpose of judging worth of prayer to quash proceedings impugned orders regarded by Trial Court comment or evaluation about evidence truth of prosecution case has to be established beyond doubt at trial in accordance with law - Court is of opinion case prosecution ought to be scuttled at threshold in exercise of powers - Dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J.
1. Heard Mr. Dr. C.P. Upadhyay, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Pradeep Kumar Mishra, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Harbansh Prasad Pandey, learned counsel for the informant and Mr. Amit Singh Chauhan, learned AGA for the State.
2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the order dated 30.01.2023 passed by Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge, POCSO Act, Allahabad in Special Sessions Trial No. 2/2023 arising out of Case Crime No. 173 of 2022, under Sections 323, 363, 328, 376Gha(Ka), 377, 504, 506 IPC and Section 5/6 POCSO Act, Police Station - Shankargarh, District - Prayagraj.
3. The brief facts as enumerated in the writ petition are as follows:
(ii) during investigation, the statement of the victim u/s 161 Cr.P.C. was recorded on 25.08.2022, which finds place at C.D. Parcha No. 6 (after more than two months of the FIR), wherein she herself has stated that her father’s name is Akbar Ali and she is resident of Surval Chandel, Nari Bari, P.S.Shankargarh, Prayagraj. She is aged about 19 years old and for fighting with her brother and sister, she was scolded by her mother and being annoyed, she left her house on 22.06.2022 at about 01:00 o’clock and went to Ajmer Sharif. Thereafter, she talked to her sister on telephone and got to know that FIR has been lodged by her father, hence she returned back, by herself, to Prayagraj.
(iii) Subsequently, the victim Nazia was medically examined on 27.08.2022 and during course of medical examination, she has stated before the doctor that the co-accused Nazim came to her house on 22.06.2022, when she was sleeping, she was made to smell some intoxicating substance due to which she fainted and after regaining her conscious, she found herself at Allahabad where a person named Asif was also present. She also stated that both the persons, i.e. Nazim and Asif, who have forcefully committed rape upon her for two days, later on, she was taken to Jammu where she was kept for two months and forcefully, physical relationship was established with her by them. The victim was dropped to Allahabad on 25.08.2022 by Nazim and three unknown persons and she was left near police station.
(iv) Thereafter, the statement of the victim under Section 164 Cr.P.C. was recorded on 30.08.2022, which finds place in CD Parcha No. 7, wherein she has stated that she is 15 years old. While she was sleeping at her house on 22.06.2022 in the night at about 02:00 a.m., Asif Siddiqui, resident of Nari Bari and Khurshid came there and made her smell some intoxicating substances due to which she became unconscious and after regaining conscious, she found herself at Allahabad where she was locked in a room and the aforesaid persons forcefully established physical relationship with her. Thereafter, Asif and Nazim fully aware and conscious did wrongful act with her. They, also beat and forcibly establish natural and unnatural physical relationship with the victim. She was kept for two days at Allahabad, thereafter, Nazim threatening the victim, took her to Jammu, where he committed rape upon her for two months relentlessly. She was also threatened by Nazim for her life and her father’s life in case of denyin
Mahendra K.C. vs. State of Karnataka and Others
Mohd. Allauddin Khan vs. State of Bihar and Others
Nahar Singh vs. State of U.P. and Another
Parbatbhai Ahir vs. State of Gujarat
Rajeev Kaurav vs. Balasahab and Others
Shafiya Khan @ Shakuntala Prajapati vs. State of U.P. (2022) 4 SCC 549
(1) If a prima facie case is made out disclosing ingredients of offence alleged against accused, Court cannot quash a criminal proceeding.(2) Cognizance of offence – Magistrate can ignore conclusion ....
The evidence produced by the accused in his defense cannot be looked into by the court at the pre-trial stage. The court's power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings is to prevent ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for a prima facie case to be made out against the accused and the limitations on the court's power to appreciate evidence at the pr....
The court emphasized that a Magistrate must apply judicial mind before summoning accused, and inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should be exercised sparingly to prevent abuse of process.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the limited jurisdiction of the court at the stage of issuing process and the emphasis on prima facie evidence to establish liability.
High Court under Section 482 CrPC cannot quash proceedings where specific allegations of cruelty, dowry demands, assaults and harassment prima facie constitute offences; no evidence appreciation at t....
The importance of corroborative medical evidence, the necessity of conducting an enquiry under Section 202(1) of Cr.P.C., and the significance of raising alarm or informing authorities about criminal....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.