MANJU RANI CHAUHAN
Sushil – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Manju Rani Chauhan, J.
1. Heard Mr. Abhishek Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Amit Singh Chauhan, learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The present case has been filed assailing the order dated 13.01.2023 passed by Additional District and Sessions Judge, Deoband, Saharanpur in Session Trial No.56 of 2021 (State Vs. Sunil and others), arising out of Case Crime No.210 of 2018, under Sections 307, 452, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station-Deoband, District Saharanpur, by which the Court concerned altered the charge u/s 307 I.P.C. against the applicant, pending before Additional District and Sessions Judge, Deoband, Saharanpur.
3. Brief facts of the case are; an FIR was lodged by opposite party no.2 against three accused persons including the applicant on 04.03.2018 at 23:46 hours, under Sections 307, 504, 506 I.P.C., which came to be registered as Case Crime No.0210 of 2018.
4. As per allegations in the FIR, the informant along with his cousin namely Amit purchased a land from Sudhir Tiwari. A civil suit with respect to the same land is pending in the Court of Civil Judge, Deoband. The family members of Sudhir Tiwari were annoyed by purchase of land by the informant and h
Anant Prakash Sinha Alias Anant Sinha Vs. State of Haryana And Another
Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Private Limited and Anr. vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Central Bureau of Investigation Vs. Karimullah Osan Khan
Harihar Chakravarty v. State of West Bengal AIR 1954 SC 266
Hasanbhai Valibhai Qureshi Vs. State of Gujarat
Jasvinder Saini & Others Vs. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.