Back
RAJEEV SINGH
Neelam Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. , Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Shri Ishuk Ali Yusuf, learned counsel for the appellant, Shri Roshan Babu Gupta, learned counsel for the private respondent and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. This criminal appeal has been filed by the appellant against the judgment and order dated 22.03.2022 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.11, Hardoi by which the learned court below has allowed Criminal Misc. Case No.11 of 2021, under Section 340 Cr.P.C. and directing Munsarim to lodge a complaint against the present appellant and her husband, namely, Satyapal Singh, under Sections 193, 465, 471 and 120B I.P.C. within 15 days before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hardoi.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that respondent No.2 lodged false First Information Report against the husband of the appellant and her family members as Case Crime No.0267 of 2017, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 302, 504 and 506 I.P.C., Police Station Kachhauna, District Hardoi. After investigation of the above case, charge-sheet was filed against some other persons and final report was also filed in favour of husband of appellant, and thereafter, case was committed to the Court of Session, which was
The accused must be the maker of the false document to be prosecuted for forgery, as highlighted in the Indian Penal Code and supported by the decision in Sheila Sebastian vs. R. Jawaharaj (2018) 7 S....
A mere breach of contract does not amount to cheating or criminal liability unless a fraudulent or dishonest intention is shown to exist at the inception of the transaction. Similarly, execution of a....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the accused can be prosecuted for forgery even if they were not the direct signatories of the false document, as long as they were involved in....
To attract the offence of forgery, the accused must be the maker of the forged document. The court also emphasized the importance of providing due opportunity to address arguments and the limitations....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the restriction imposed by Section 195 of Cr.P.C. on the power of the Court to take cognizance of certain offences, and the interpretation of 'fals....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
