SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 972

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SIDDHARTHA VARMA, ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, JJ.
Digvendra Pratap Singh - Petitioner
Versus
Union Of India and Others - Respondents
Writ Tax No. 1510 of 2022
Decided On : 11-08-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ami Tandon, Abhinav Gaur, Vibhu Rai.
For the Respondents: Naveen Chandra Gupta.

Headnote:

Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 – Section 4, 5 – Challenged order – Income Tax Department – Payment of balance tax – Tax liability – Held, Apex Court did not consider issue of condoning the delay in extraordinary circumstances but only observed that benefit of scheme cannot be extended from time prescribed under scheme – Considering pleadings and perusal of record, this Court is of view that a delay of three days in depositing arrears of tax deserves to be condoned, and amount balance tax deposited by petitioner be accepted by respondents treating same well within time as per scheme of Act, 2020 and also impugned order /letter, passed by Central Board of Direct Tax, is hereby quashed – Writ petition allowed.

ORDER :

(Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal, J.)

1. Heard Sri Anoop Trivedi, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Ami Tandon and Sri Abhinav Gaur, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Naveen Chandra Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent Department.

2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 25.8.2022 passed by respondent No.3 by which the application of the petitioner for condoning the delay of three days in depositing the balance amount payable by him under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (hereinafter referred to as “Act, 2020”), has been rejected.

3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the Parliament enacted the Act 2020 for the resolution of disputed tax. As per the above Act, 2020, the declarant should submit his declaration u/s 4 of the Act, 2020 before the designated authority, and thereafter the designated authority, after receiving the declaration submitted by the declarant, will grant a certificate to the declarant containing particulars of the tax arrears and the amount payable after such determination. It is further contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that in pursuance of the scheme of the above Act 2020, for the resolution of the tax for the Assessment Year 2010-11, the petitioner submitted his declaration on 5.6.2020 as required u/s 4 of the Act, 2020. After submission of the aforesaid declaration certificate of designated authority in Form-III as per Section 5 of the Act, 2020 was also uploaded on the portal on 9.11.2020, which was also downloaded by the petitioner on the same day. As per this certificate, the petitioner was required to pay Rs. 18,67,137/-on or before 31.12.2020. Before the expiry of the last date, the Ministry of Finance issued a notification dated 27.10.2020, by which the last date of submission of the balance amount was extended up to 31.3.2021. Subsequently, the aforesaid notification dated 27.10.2020 was amended by the Central Government by issuing another notification extending the last date of payment of balance tax and lastly, by notification dated 25.6.2021, the last date for payment of balance tax was extended till 31.10.2021. On 31.10.2021, it was Sunday. Therefore, to deposit the balance tax as mentioned in the certificate issued by the designated authority u/s 5 of the Act, 2020, the petitioner dropped a cheque for the amount of Rs. 8,67,137/-(after adjusting Rs. 10 Lakh which was already deposited by him prior to issuance of Form -III) in the drop box of the bank on Sunday itself, but the receipt for the payment (Challan) was issued by the bank on 3.11.2021, on encashment of the above cheque.

4. It was further submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that petitioner also met with an unfortunate accident on 1.11.2021 in which serious injuries were caused in his right knee and he was advised complete bed rest for a period of three days i.e. from 1.11.2021 to 3.11.2021 and in support of his claim, the petitioner has also annexed the medical certificate issued by the doctor as Annexure-8 to the writ petition. However, despite depositing the money in the account of the Income Tax Department, he was not permitted to submit/file Form-IV so as to entirely avail the benefit of the scheme under the Act 2020 because of the delay of three days in the generation of challan by the bank. Feeling aggrieved by the above action of the Income Tax Department, the petitioner moved an application before the Chairman of the Central Board of Direct Taxes on 15.11.2021 with a prayer that appropriate order be issued for condoning the delay of three days in depositing the balance amount towards his tax liability, but the above application was rejected by the impugned order dated 25.8.2022 on the ground that once last date has been mentioned in the notification to deposit the balance tax liability; therefore, the same

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top