Parmanand Sirumal Tahalramani vs State Of U. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(All) 1063

SHREE PRAKASH SINGH
Parmanand Sirumal Tahalramani – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Gantavya

JUDGMENT :

1. At the very outset, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that she may be permitted to withdraw the prayer clause ‘c’ and the same may be permitted to be deleted.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the State has no objection to the contention aforesaid.

3. In view of the aforesaid submissions, the applicant’s counsel is permitted to withdraw the prayer clause ‘c’ with further permission of deleting the same during the course of the day.

4. Heard, Ms. Neha Rashmi and Gantavya, learned counsels for the applicants, Sri Aniruddh Kumar Singh, learned AGA-I for the State and perused the material placed on record.

5. By means of the present application, prayer has been made to set-aside the order dated 26.05.2023 passed by respondent no. 2 in S.T. No. 375 of 2007 (State Vs. Sunit Tehlyan and Others) arising out of Case Crime No. 25 of 2005, under Section 302, 304 B, 201, 498 A r/w Section 34 of IPC and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act and Section 30 of Arms Act, P.S. Manak Nagar, District Lucknow and further prayer is made that the applicant nos. 1 to 3 may be treated as the legal heirs of the victim, as applicant no. 1 is real uncle of the deceased and th