IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
ANJANI KUMAR MISHRA, SHIV SHANKER PRASAD, JJ.
Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Maratha and Another – Petitioners
Versus
State of U.P. and Others – Respondents
Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 10919 of 2023
Decided On : 20-07-2023
U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 - Section 2/3 - Gangsters Act - Section 2(b)(vi) - Public Gambling Act, 1867 - Section 3 - Definition of word "Gang" - Challenge writ petition - Held, charge-sheet in base case against the petitioners had been filed and the impugned FIR has been lodged against them - Court do not find any illegality in manner in which the first information report had been lodged - Moreover, allegations in first information report, in considered opinion, contain ingredients of a cognizable offence - Writ petition dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Shri Manish Tiwari, Learned Senior Advocate for the petitioners and Shri Pankaj Saxena, learned AGA for the State.
2. Challenge in the writ petition is to the first information report dated 30.6.2023 giving rise to Case Crime No. 441 of 2023 under Section 2/3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station-Kasganj, District-Kasgang.
3. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that the offences alleged in the first information report do not fall within the category of offences specified in the Act of 1986. In any case, the petitioner does not fall within the definition of the word 'gang' as occurring in Section 2(b) of the Act. Another ground taken in the writ petition is that the proceedings under the Gangsters Act are mala fide. No cognizable offence is disclosed from the allegations made in the first information report.
4. The petitioners in the writ petition are Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Maratha and Monu Maheshwari @ Manoj Kumar. The provisions of the Gangsters Act have been imposed against them on the basis of a single case being Case Crime No. 256 of 2023 under Sections 3/4 of the Public Gambling Act wherein the petitioners are stated to be on bail.
5. The word “gang” is defined in Section 2(b) of the Act which reads as follows:
(i) offences punishable under Chapter XVI or Chapter XVII or Chapter XXII of the Indian Penal Code (Act No. 45 of 1860).
(ii) distilling or manufacturing or storing or transporting or importing or exporting or selling or distributing any liquor, or intoxicating or dangerous drugs, or other intoxicants or narcotics or cultivating any plant, in contravention of any of the provisions of the U.P. Excise Act, 1910 (U.P. Act No. 4 of 1910), or the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985), or any other law for the time being in force.
(iii) occupying or taking possession of immovable property otherwise than in accordance with law, or setting-up false claims for title or possession of immovable property whether in himself or any other person.
(iv) preventing or attempting to prevent any public servant or any witness from discharging his lawful duties.
(v) offences punishable under the Suppression of Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act, 1956 (Act No. 104 of 1956).
(vi) offences punishable under Section 3 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 (Act No. 3 of 1867).
(vii) preventing any person from offering bids in auction lawfully conducted, or tender, lawfully invited, by or on behalf of any Government department, local body or public or private undertaking, for any lease or rights or supply of goods or work to be done.
(viii) preventing or disturbing the smooth running by any person of his lawful business, profession, trade or employment or any other lawful activity connected therewith.
(ix) offences punishable under Section 171-E of the Indian Penal Code (Act No. 45 of 1860), or in preventing or obstructing any public election being lawfully held, by physically preventing the voter from exercising his electoral rights.
(x) inciting others to resort to violence to disturb communal harmony.
(xi) creating panic, alarm or terror in public.
(xii) terrorising or assaulting employees or owners or occupiers of public or private undertakings or factories and causing mischief in respect of their properties.
(xiii) inducing or attempting to induce any person to go to foreign countries on false representation that any employment, trade or profession shall be provided to him in such foreign country.
(xiv) kidnapping or abducting any person with intent to extort ransom.
(xv) diverting or
Indulge in anti-social activities - Disturbing public order - Existence of two criminal cases against petitioner is not in dispute and no ground exists for quashing impugned FIR.
(1) A person against whom a single FIR/charge sheet is filed for any of anti-social activities mentioned in section 2(b) of Gangsters Act, 1986 can be prosecuted under Gangsters Act.(2) Provisions of....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 to the appellant's actions, and the court's interp....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to strictly interpret the provisions of the Gangsters Act to prevent misuse by state authorities and the importance of vigilance be....
An FIR under the Gangsters Act must specify anti-social activities to classify a person as a gangster; failure to do so renders the FIR illegal.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.