SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 1844

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SIDDHARTH, VINOD DIWAKAR, JJ.
Jaydeep Nishad And Another - Petitioners
Versus
State of UP And 2 Others - Respondents
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION NO. 2849 OF 2024.
Decided On : 26-02-2024

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ganesh Kumar
For the Respondent: G.A.

An FIR under the Gangsters Act must specify anti-social activities to classify a person as a gangster; failure to do so renders the FIR illegal.

Headnote:(A) U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 - Section 3(1) - Quashing of FIR - FIR registered under Section 3(1) without specifying anti-social activities is illegal - A person cannot be classified as a gangster without clear allegations of involvement in anti-social activities as defined in Section 2(b) - The provisions of the Act must be strictly interpreted to prevent misuse. (Paras 2, 5, 9, 10)

(B) Personal Liberty - Article 21 of the Constitution - The deprivation of personal liberty must adhere to the procedure established by law, and authorities must justify any such deprivation. (Paras 7, 8)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought to quash an FIR registered under Section 3(1) of the Gangsters Act, which only mentioned the penalty provision without detailing the anti-social activities alleged against him.

Findings of Court:
The FIR was quashed as it failed to specify the relevant anti-social activities, rendering it illegal under the Gangsters Act.

Issues: Whether an FIR can be validly registered under the Gangsters Act without detailing the anti-social activities involved.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that a person cannot be prosecuted as a gangster without clear allegations of involvement in activities defined under the Gangsters Act, emphasizing the need for strict adherence to statutory provisions.

Result: Petition allowed, FIR quashed.

JUDGMENT

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. The instant writ petition seeks quashing of the FIR dated 27.01.2024 giving rise to Case Crime No. 12 of 2024, under Section 3(1) U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as "Gangsters Act"), P.S. Rudhauli, District-Basti.

3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that in the impugned F.I.R., only Section 3(1) of Gangsters Act was mentioned which is the provision for imposing penalty upon gangsters. However, no other provision is mentioned showing the anti social activities in which the petitioner is alleged to have indulged on account of which the petitioner is being prosecuted as gangster.

4. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the record, this Court finds that the impugned F.I.R. has been registered under section 3(1) Gangsters Act. This Section provides punishment for gangsters. However, Section 2 of Gangsters Act provides anti social activities which form the basis for classifying a person as a gangster. Section 2(b) defines "gang" and Section 2(c) defines "gangster". The definition of "gangster", mentioned in Section 2(c) clearly mentions that the person to be named as gangster must be involved in activities enumerated in Clause (b) of Section 2 of Gangsters Act. Section 2(b), 2(c) and 3 of Gangsters Act are being reproduced as under:-

    "2(b). "Gang" means a group of persons, who acting either singly or collectively, by violence, or threat or show of violence, or intimidation, or coercion or otherwise with the object of disturbing public order or of gaining any undue temporal, pecuniary, material or other advantage for himself or any other person, indulge in anti-social activities, namely-

    (i) offences punishable under Chapter XVI or Chapter XVII or Chapter XXII of the Indian Penal Code (Act No. 45 of 1860), or

    (ii) distilling or manufacturing or storing or transporting or importing or exporting or selling or distributing any liquor, or intoxicating or dangerous drugs, or other intoxicants or narcotics or cultivating any plant, in contravention of any of the provisions of the U.P. Excise Act, 1910 (U.P. Act No. 4 of 1910), or the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985), or any other law for the time being in force, or

    (iii) occupying or taking possession of immovable property otherwise than in accordance with law, or setting-up false claims for title or possession of immovable property whether in himself or any other person, or

    (iv) preventing or attempting to prevent any public servant or any witness from discharging his lawful duties, or

    (v) offences punishable under the Suppression of Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act, 1956 (Act No. 104 of 1956), or

    (vi) offences punishable under section 3 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 (Act No. 3 of 1867), or

    (vii) preventing any person from offering bids in auction lawfully conducted, or tender, lawfully invited, by or on behalf of any Government department, local body or public or private undertaking, for any lease or rights or supply of goods or work to be done, or

    (viii) preventing or disturbing the smooth running by any person of his lawful business, profession, trade or employment or any other lawful activity connected therewith, or

    (ix) offences punishable under Section 171E of the Indian Penal Code (Act No. 45 of 1860), or in preventing or obstructing any public election being lawfully held, by physically preventing the voter from exercising his electoral rights, or

    (x) inciting others to resort to violence to disturb communal harmony, or

    (xi) creating panic, alarm or terror in public, or

    (xii) terrorising or assaulting employees or owners or occupiers of public or private undertakings or factories and causing mischief in respect of their properties, or

    (xiii) inducing or attempting to induce any person to go to foreign countries on false representation that any

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top