IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SIDDHARTH, VINOD DIWAKAR, JJ.
Jaydeep Nishad And Another - Petitioners
Versus
State of UP And 2 Others - Respondents
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION NO. 2849 OF 2024.
Decided On : 26-02-2024
JUDGMENT
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The instant writ petition seeks quashing of the FIR dated 27.01.2024 giving rise to Case Crime No. 12 of 2024, under Section 3(1) U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as "Gangsters Act"), P.S. Rudhauli, District-Basti.
3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that in the impugned F.I.R., only Section 3(1) of Gangsters Act was mentioned which is the provision for imposing penalty upon gangsters. However, no other provision is mentioned showing the anti social activities in which the petitioner is alleged to have indulged on account of which the petitioner is being prosecuted as gangster.
4. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the record, this Court finds that the impugned F.I.R. has been registered under section 3(1) Gangsters Act. This Section provides punishment for gangsters. However, Section 2 of Gangsters Act provides anti social activities which form the basis for classifying a person as a gangster. Section 2(b) defines "gang" and Section 2(c) defines "gangster". The definition of "gangster", mentioned in Section 2(c) clearly mentions that the person to be named as gangster must be involved in activities enumerated in Clause (b) of Section 2 of Gangsters Act. Section 2(b), 2(c) and 3 of Gangsters Act are being reproduced as under:-
"2(b). "Gang" means a group of persons, who acting either singly or collectively, by violence, or threat or show of violence, or intimidation, or coercion or otherwise with the object of disturbing public order or of gaining any undue temporal, pecuniary, material or other advantage for himself or any other person, indulge in anti-social activities, namely-
(i) offences punishable under Chapter XVI or Chapter XVII or Chapter XXII of the Indian Penal Code (Act No. 45 of 1860), or
(ii) distilling or manufacturing or storing or transporting or importing or exporting or selling or distributing any liquor, or intoxicating or dangerous drugs, or other intoxicants or narcotics or cultivating any plant, in contravention of any of the provisions of the U.P. Excise Act, 1910 (U.P. Act No. 4 of 1910), or the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (Act No. 61 of 1985), or any other law for the time being in force, or
(iii) occupying or taking possession of immovable property otherwise than in accordance with law, or setting-up false claims for title or possession of immovable property whether in himself or any other person, or
(iv) preventing or attempting to prevent any public servant or any witness from discharging his lawful duties, or
(v) offences punishable under the Suppression of Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act, 1956 (Act No. 104 of 1956), or
(vi) offences punishable under section 3 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 (Act No. 3 of 1867), or
(vii) preventing any person from offering bids in auction lawfully conducted, or tender, lawfully invited, by or on behalf of any Government department, local body or public or private undertaking, for any lease or rights or supply of goods or work to be done, or
(viii) preventing or disturbing the smooth running by any person of his lawful business, profession, trade or employment or any other lawful activity connected therewith, or
(ix) offences punishable under Section 171E of the Indian Penal Code (Act No. 45 of 1860), or in preventing or obstructing any public election being lawfully held, by physically preventing the voter from exercising his electoral rights, or
(x) inciting others to resort to violence to disturb communal harmony, or
(xi) creating panic, alarm or terror in public, or
(xii) terrorising or assaulting employees or owners or occupiers of public or private undertakings or factories and causing mischief in respect of their properties, or
(xiii) inducing or attempting to induce any person to go to foreign countries on false representation that any
AI
An FIR under the Gangsters Act must specify anti-social activities to classify a person as a gangster; failure to do so renders the FIR illegal.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to strictly interpret the provisions of the Gangsters Act to prevent misuse by state authorities and the importance of vigilance be....
An FIR under the Gangster Act is invalid if it fails to mention the corresponding provision, violating statutory guidelines.
An FIR registered under the U.P. Gangster Act without proper legal citation and after a three-year lapse is rendered illegal.
(1) A person against whom a single FIR/charge sheet is filed for any of anti-social activities mentioned in section 2(b) of Gangsters Act, 1986 can be prosecuted under Gangsters Act.(2) Provisions of....
(1) Anti-Social Activity - Mere involvement of accused appellants in a demonstration pursuant to a communal flare-up, however serious, does not ipso facto transform participants into a ''gang'' witho....
The court emphasized that allegations must meet a serious threshold for invoking the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters & Anti-Social Activities Act, quashing an FIR based on insufficient grounds.
Proceedings of FIR under provisions of Gangsters Act and prosecution of accused cannot be continued in spite of exoneration in predicate offences.
Gangster - Quash of FIR - A first information report on basis of a single case is valid and permissible under Act, 1986. No difficulty to hold that first information report may be lodged on basis of ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.