SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV
Deepak Prakash Singh @ Deepak Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr V. P. Srivastava, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr Arun Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State of U.P. and perused the record. Learned counsel for the informant is also present.
2. This Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 0139 of 2023, under Sections 354,376 IPC and Section 7/8 of POCSO Act and Section 3(2)(Va) of SC/ST Act, P.S. Jafarabad, District Jaunpur, during the pendency of present application.
3. A preliminary objection has been raised by learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for the informant with regard to the maintainability of the instant application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. by virtue of bar contained under Section 18 and 18A of the S.C./S.T. Act and Section 438(6) Cr.P.C. as it is applicable in the State of U.P. contending anticipatory bail application moved by applicant is not maintainable by virtue of bar contained under Section 438 (6) Cr.P.C.
4. In reply to the above contention, it is submitted by learned senior counsel for the applicant that comparative analysis of the objects, scheme and scope of Protect
Prithvi Raj Chauhan Vs. Union of India and others; 2020 4 SCC 727
The procedure under the POCSO Act prevails over the SC/ST Act when both offences are charged, and the jurisdiction of the Special Court under the POCSO Act applies in determining the bail plea when o....
The court held that under the SC/ST (PoA) Act, the statutory bar in Section 18 precludes the granting of anticipatory bail when offences under the Act are prima facie established against the accused,....
The court established that anticipatory bail cannot be granted in cases where prima facie offences under the SC/ST (POA) Act are made out.
Order granting or rejecting anticipatory bail under provisions of SC/ST Act shall be amenable to appellate jurisdiction of High Court under Section 14A of Act and not Section 438 Cr.P.C.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the application for anticipatory bail under the SC ST Act can be entertained if the allegations in the FIR do not prima facie make out the bas....
The exclusive jurisdiction of Special Courts under the SC/ST Act, the primacy of victim and witness rights, and the requirement to ascertain prima facie case for an offence under the Act before consi....
While considering any application seeking pre-arrest bail, High Court has to balance two interests: i.e. that the power is not so used as to convert jurisdiction into that under Section 438 of Crimin....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.