IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
Mohammad Ali @ Gulam – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home, Civil Sectt. Lko. And Another – Respondents
Criminal Misc Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 438 Cr.P.C. No.2176 of 2023
Decided on : 06-10-2023
Cow Slaughter Act - Anticipatory Bail - The court granted anticipatory bail to the applicant, Mohammad Ali @ Gulam, in a case registered under Sections 3, 5, 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act, 1955, based on the finding that the facts and circumstances of the case were sufficient to make out a case for granting anticipatory bail.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 3, 5, 8 of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955, based on an FIR alleging cow slaughter and escape from the police.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the facts and circumstances, including the lack of disclosure of the quantity of flesh allegedly recovered and the improbability of the narration in the FIR, supported granting anticipatory bail to the applicant.
Issues: Anticipatory bail in a case under the Cow Slaughter Act, 1955.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the lack of disclosure of the quantity of flesh allegedly recovered, the improbability of the narration in the FIR, and the applicant's lack of previous criminal history as sufficient grounds for granting anticipatory bail.
Final Decision: The anticipatory bail application of the applicant was allowed, subject to specified conditions.
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Avinash Srivastava holding brief of Sri Ashok KUmar Srivastava, the learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Jayant Singh Tomar, the learned AGA-I for the State and perused the records.
2. The instant application has been filed by the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in an FIR bearing Case Crime No. 665 of 2020, under Sections 3, 5, 8 of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955, Police Station Lalganj, District Pratapgarh.
3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an FIR lodged by a Sub Inspector of Police on 01.10.2020 against four unnamed persons, alleging that on the basis of information received from a mukhbir, a police party reached a grove and upon seeing them, the accused persons started running away on two motorcycles. When they were chased, they left one motorcycle and all of them escaped on the other motorcycle. Flesh of cow progeny packed in a sac was kept on the motorcycle and some remains of a cow progeny was laying nearby.
4. In the affidavit filed in support of the application, it has been contended that the applicant is innocent, he has falsely been implicated in the present case and that he has no criminal history.
5. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the FIR does not disclose the quantity of flesh allegedly recovered; that the narration made in the FIR that four accused persons were trying to escape on two motorcycles but upon being chased, they left one motorcycle on the spot and all four of them escaped on the other motorcycle, appears to be inherently improbable; that the applicant has no previous criminal history, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for granting anticipatory bail to the applicant.
6. In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant is allowed. In the event of arrest/ appearance of applicant-Mohammad Ali @ Gulam before the learned Trial Court in the aforesaid case, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing personal bond and two solvent sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of S.H.O./Court concerned on the following conditions and subject to any other conditions that may be fixed by the Trial Court:
(ii). That the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;
(iii). That the applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
The court may grant anticipatory bail based on the facts and circumstances of the case, including the lack of disclosure of crucial information and the improbability of the allegations.
Anticipatory bail may be granted in the absence of direct evidence against the applicant, provided the applicant agrees to cooperate with the investigation and adhere to specified conditions.
Anticipatory bail can be granted when there is insufficient evidence to substantiate the charges against the applicant, provided they agree to cooperate with the investigation and comply with specifi....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, emphasizing the importance of personal liberty under A....
The court established that anticipatory bail can be granted when there is insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegations against the applicant, ensuring the rights of the accused are protected....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.