RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA
Parmeshwar Srivastava @ Pappi – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Prakash Chandra Srivastava, learned counsel for the revisionist/applicant, learned counsel for the opposite party No.2, learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.
2. Instant criminal revision has been preferred against judgment and order dated 9.1.2023 passed by learned C.J.M. Varanasi in Complaint Case No. 9647 of 2021, under Section 138 N.I. Act, P.S. Rohaniya, District Varanasi, whereby discharge application moved by revisionist/accused has been dismissed and the case was fixed for recording statement of the accused.
3. Factual matrix of the case in brief is that complainant who is respondent no. 2 in present revision filed a complaint before the court of Special C.J.M., Varanasi, under Section 138 N.I. Act which is registered as criminal case no. 9647 of 2021 wherein he has stated that complainant is having huge chunk of plots in Mauza Badi Khajuri Varanasi. The accused Parmeshwar Srivastava came into conact with him and posed himself as Director/Office bearer of Shine City Infra Project Limited and stated that he was purchasing plots for said Company and also promised to pay dividends by borrowing money in personal capacity from p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.