VIVEK KUMAR BIRLA, VINOD DIWAKAR
Tuphail Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Agnivesh holding brief of Sri Vineet Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Sumit Goyal, learned counsel for the informant, Sri Virendra Kumar Pal, learned A.G.A for the State respondents and perused the records.
2. The relief sought in this petition is for quashing of the first information report dated 11.07.2023, registered as Case Crime No. 249 of 2023, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, Police Station Cantt., District Bareilly.
3. The FIR impugned herein has been lodged in respect of sale deed executed on 24.02.1992. Allegation in the FIR is that one Raj Kumar Malhotra, who was having registered power of attorney dated 10.04.1991 in his favour executed by Tuphail Ahmad (petitioner no.1) for selling the plots of the property, which was being developed by the petitioner no.1-Tuphail Ahmad known as Bukhara Enclave, District Bareilly. He had executed a sale deed dated 24.02.1992 in respect of plot no.18, area 229 sq.yard, in favour of the informant-Dr. Rajesh Tandon possession whereof was also handed over. Thereafter, again by registered sale deed dated 04.02.2004 the petitioner no.1-Tuphail Ahmad alongwith others executed through Raj Kumar Malhot
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.