RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA
Irshad Khan – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionists and learned AGA for the State. None appeared on behalf of respondent no. 2 to contest this criminal revision today.
2. Counter affidavit has already been filed by respondent no. 2 in this case. Learned counsel for the revisionists has submitted that he is not inclined to file rejoinder affidavit and prayed for hearing the matter on merits.
3. The present criminal revision is filed against the order dated 4.11.2022 passed by learned C.J.M., Jalaun at Orai in Misc. Case no. 327 of 2019 (State vs. Irshad Khan and others) arising out of Case Crime no. 162 of 2018 under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 336, 332, 353, 420, 447, 504, 506 IPC and Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act, P.S. Kotwali Kalpi, District Jalaun. By the impugned order, learned C.J.M. has dismissed the discharge application 24 kha moved by the accused persons and issued bailable warrant against absentee accused Nausad.
4. The brief facts of the case is that the informant lodged an FIR on the basis of written report on 18.7.2018 stating that he is Lekhpal of Kasba Kalpi and plot no. 38/4 area 0.170 and plot no. 38/6 area 0.210 hectare, total area 0.380 hectare come u
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.