JUDGMENT :

1. The present criminal revision under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C has been preferred against the order dated 07.05.2019 passed by the Special Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (CBI) (AP), Lucknow in criminal Case No. 2229 of 2006 State Vs. Kawar Mahmood Lari and others rejecting the application of the revisionist under Section 239 Cr.P.C for their discharge from the above mentioned criminal case.

2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the revisionist that the said Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate has utterly failed to apply its judicial mind in the matter and passed the impugned order in a very cursory manner. Apprising the fact, learned counsel for the revisionist submitted that the aforesaid FIR was lodged to the effect that the ascendants of late Mumtaz Ahmad Lari the father of first informant was carrying out plotting of plot No. 224 and 225 area 28206 sq. ft situated in village Iradatganj Sitapur Road Lucknow and transferred the same to different persons by different sale deeds including the revisionist who are shown as accused along with vendor thereof in the FIR. The first informant Musheer Ahmad Lari along with four other descendants of late Mumtaz Ahmad