NEERAJ TIWARI
Mustafa @ Chautha – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Ramesh Kumar Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri Anil Kumar, learned counsel for opposite party No. 2.
2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the order dated 15.05.2023 passed by Special Judge (POCSO Act)/Additional Session Judge, Mirzapur in S.T. No. 18 of 2014 (State Vs. Mustafa), arising out of Case Crime No. 581 of 2013, under Sections-294, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station- Kotwali Dehat, District- Mirzapur.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that during the course of trial, it was found that certain questions are necessary to be asked from P.W.-8(Dr. Afzal Ahmad), therefore, applicant has moved application under Section 311 Cr.P.C to summon P.W.-8(Dr. Afzal Ahmad). It is next submitted that the questions proposed to be asked are very relevant for fair trial and justice to accused. He next submitted that the Apex Court in the matter of P. Sanjeeva Rao vs. The State of A.P.; Criminal Appeal Nos. 874-875 of 2012 (arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) Nos. 4286-87 of 2011) has taken view that in all eventuality, even at the cost of delay of proceedings, applicat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.