VIVEK KUMAR BIRLA, ANISH KUMAR GUPTA
Jitendra Singh @ Bablu – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Man Singh Chauhan, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Santosh Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing for the informant and Sri Ratan Singh, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State respondents and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners, who are the accused in Case Crime No. 0057 of 2022 u/S 147, 148, 323, 324, 325, 308, 504, 506 IPC, challenging and seeking quashing of the impugned order dated 06.12.2022, issued by the Superintendent of Police, Kushinagar, directing further investigation in the matter after analysing the report/charge-sheet and finding some deficiencies in the investigation, though the said report/ charge-sheet was already submitted before the Magistrate and the Magistrate has already taken the cognizance on the said report/ charge-sheet.
3. The brief facts of the case are that on 21.03.2022, the applicant/ respondent no.4 herein lodged the First Information Report, which was registered as Case Crime No. 0057 of 2022. In the FIR, it was alleged that the informant/respondent no.4, Ajay Singh s/o Harikesh Singh, R/o Dudahi Barhara, P.S.-Vishnupura, District-Kushinagar, has some dispute with his brot
Vinay Tyagi vs. Irshad Ali @ Deepak & Others
Ram Lal Narang vs. State (Delhi Administration)
Rama Chaudhary vs. State of Bihar
State of Bihar and Another vs. J.A.C. Saldanha and Others
K. Chandrashekhar vs. State of Kerela
King Emperor v. Khwaja Nazir Ahmad
Hasanbhai Valibhai Qureshi v. State of Gujarat
K. Chandrasekhar v. State of Kerala
Bhagwant Singh v. Commr. of Police
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.