JUDGMENT :

SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.

1. Heard Sri Ravindra Kumar Yadav, the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Akhilesh Kumar Vyas, the learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State and Ms. Suniti Sachan, the learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2/informant.

2. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant seeking quashing of the impugned charge-sheet no. 1/2023 dated 16.05.2023, summoning order dated 25.05.2023 including the entire proceedings of Case No. 59497 of 2023 State vs. Keshav Ugan Jha, arising out of Case Crime No. 0047 of 2023, under Sections 409, 420, 504, 506 I.P.C. Police Station Vibhuti Khand, District Lucknow pending in the Court of District and Sessions Judge, Lucknow.

3. The opposite party no. 2 had lodged an F.I.R. on 24.01.2023 against the applicant and one Desh Dipak Azad, alleging that the informant's company Fuzenite Infratel Pvt. Ltd. had received an order to supply TMT bars (iron bars) to a construction company and he had in turn placed order upon Keshav Enterprises, a company based at Pune and owned by the applicant, through the co-accused Desh Dipak Azad. The informant had paid fifty percent of the sale considerati