IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Saurabh Lavania, J.
Khursheed and Another – Applicants
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and anr. – Opposite Parties
Application U/S 482 No. – 5525, 12429, 12443 of 2023
Decided On : 21-12-2023
Quashing of Criminal Proceedings - Compromise - Sections 147, 279, 337, 233, 504, 506 & 452 IPC, Section 3(1)(D) & 3(2) V(A) of SC/ST Act - 227, 239, 245 CrPC - GIAN SINGH V. STATE OF PUNJAB (2012) 10 SCC 303, PARBATBHAI AAHIR V. STATE OF GUJARAT (2017) 9 SCC 641, State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan, (2019) 5 SCC 688, Ramgopal vs. State of M.P. (2022) 14 SCC 531 - The High Court can quash the charge-sheet and/or criminal proceeding even if the offence is non-compoundable under Section 320 of the CrPC. The power can be exercised in the light of the settled propositions by the Hon'ble Apex Court.
Fact of the Case:
The applicants sought to quash the criminal proceedings based on compromise. The court allowed the applications as the parties had settled the dispute and the chance of conviction was bleak.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the criminal proceedings could be quashed based on the compromise and the nature of the accusations. It held that no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the proceedings pending against the applicants.
Issues: The main issue was whether the criminal proceedings could be quashed based on the compromise entered into by the parties.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on various judgments including GIAN SINGH V. STATE OF PUNJAB (2012) 10 SCC 303, PARBATBHAI AAHIR V. STATE OF GUJARAT (2017) 9 SCC 641, State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan, (2019) 5 SCC 688, Ramgopal vs. State of M.P. (2022) 14 SCC 531 to establish the legal principle that the High Court can quash the charge-sheet and/or criminal proceeding even if the offence is non-compoundable under Section 320 of the CrPC.
Final Decision: The court allowed the applications and quashed the criminal proceedings including the charge-sheets and summoning orders based on the compromise entered into by the parties.
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Shri G.C. Sinha, Advocate and Shri Avinash Singh Vishen, Advocate (Amicus Curiae), who appeared in the APPLICATION U/S 482 No. -5525 of 2023, Shri Anurag Kumar Singh along with Shri Pushpendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicants in APPLICATION U/S 482 No. -12429 of 2023 and Shri Salil Kumar Srivastava, Advocate, counsel for the applicant in APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 12443 of 2023.
2. In all the applications noted below, the question is as to "Whether charge-sheet and/or criminal proceedings based upon the compromise, can be quashed in part." In other words "Whether the charge-sheet and/or criminal proceedings based upon the compromise can be quashed qua the accused- applicant." As such, all the petitions are being clubbed together and are being decided by this common order.
3.1 In APPLICATION U/S 482 No.-5525 of 2023, the following main relief(s) has been sought:-
3.2 In APPLICATION U/S 482 No.-5525 of 2023, this Court on 30.05.2023 after considering the issue involved passed the following order:
Office is directed to print the name of Sri Rudra Mani Shukla, Advocate as counsel for the opposite party no.2 when the case is listed next.
Learned counsel appearing for the applicants shall apprise the court that as to whether on the basis of compromise entered into between the two accused persons and the opposite parties, apart from the fact that there are five accused persons, the part trial can be quashed.
List/put up this matter in the first week of June, 2023 as fresh."
3.4 After the aforesaid order, this Court passed the order dated 07.08.2023 whereby Shri Avinash Singh Vishen, Advocate was appointed Amicus Curiae to assist the Court on the issue aforesaid. The order dated 07.08.2023 reads as under:-
This Court invites Shri Avinash Singh Bisen, Advocate to assist this Court and he is hereby appointed as amicus curiae. He will be paid fee as per the norms of legal aid services authorities.
List/put up this matter on 24.08.2023 at 3.30 PM.
The counsel for the appellant shall also provide a copy of the record to the amicus curiae in between."
3.5 It would be apt to indicate that the applicants earlier approached this Court by means of APPLICATION U/S 482 No.-8536 of 2019 and the same was disposed of on 25.04.2023 by this Court for the purpose of verification of compromise by the trial court and in terms of the order of this Court dated 25.04.2023, the trial court verified the compromise on 03.05.2023 and the present application has been filed seeking relief(s) quoted above based upon the compromise dated 03.05.2023 duly verified by the trial court on 03.05.2023.
4.1 In the APPLICATION U/S 482 No. -12443 of 2023, (Karamveer Tripathi and others vs. State of U.P. and Another), the following main relief has been sought:-
Chandra Bhal vs. State of U.P.
Geeta Mehrotra and another vs. State of U.P.
Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab
Lovely Salhotra and Another vs. State (NCT of Delhi) And Another
Narindra Singh and others vs. State of Punjab
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings based on compromise, even if the offence is non-compoundable, in accordance with the settled propositions by the Hon'ble Apex Court.
Point of Law : Powers of this Court under Article 142 can be invoked to quash a criminal proceeding on the basis of a voluntary compromise between the complainant/victim and accused.
Section 482 preserves inherent powers of High Court to prevent an abuse of process of any court or to secure ends of justice.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the court has inherent power to quash criminal proceedings, even in non-compoundable cases, based on genuine compromises, considering the natu....
The sparing and cautious exercise of inherent power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, considering the nature and gravity of the offences, the impact on society, and the possibility....
Inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. can quash proceedings based on valid compromise, provided it serves justice and prevents abuse of process, especially for non-heinous offences.
Point of Law : POCSO Act – Compromise – Quash of criminal proceedings.
Quashing – High Court has inherent power to quash criminal proceedings even in those cases which are not compoundable, but such power is to be exercised sparingly and with great caution.
High Court may quash non-compoundable FIRs for rash/negligent driving causing death on genuine compromise by victim family, as offences not heinous, conviction remote, securing ends of justice and pr....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.