SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(All) 2412

CHANDRA KUMAR RAI
Ibne Haidar – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : Sanjay Kr. Srivastava
For the Respondent: Ayush Srivastava, G.A.

JUDGMENT :

Chandra Kumar Rai, J.

1. Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the applicants, is taken on record.

2. Heard Sri Sanjay Kr. Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Shushil Kumar Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Sri Ayush Srivastava, learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 2 to 8 and learned AGA for the State/opposite party no. 1.

3. The instant application under section 482 Cr.P.C. has been for quashing the entire proceeding of S.T. No. 62 of 2017 (State Vs. Ibne Haidar & others) Case Crime No. 28 of 2016, u/s 147, 148, 149, 452, 323, 324, 325, 427, 307, 308, 34 IPC, P.S. Kithore, District Meerut for the charge sheet dated 04.04.2016 and its order of cognizance dated 11.04.2016 (Against applicant no. 1) as well as S.T. No. 963 of 2019 (State Vs. Akeel Haidar & others), Case Crime No. 28 of 2016, u/s 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 504, 506, 307, 308, 452, 427, 34 IPC, P.S. Kithore, District Meerut for the charge sheet dated 19.04.2019 and its order of cognizance dated 25.06.2019 (Against the applicant nos. 2 to 9), pending before the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 3, Meerut.

4. Brief facts of the case are that the opposite party no. 2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top