Back
AJIT KUMAR
Anil Kumar Katiyar – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Ajit Kumar, J.)
1. Heard Sri V.K. Singh, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Mayank Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner in Writ – A No. 19750 of 2022, Sri Ajeet Singh, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Indra Raj Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner in Writ – A No. 2932 of 2023, Sri Atul Tej Kulshrestha, learned Advocate appearing for the respective petitioners in Writ – A No. 21543 of 2022 and Writ -A No. 21585 of 2022, Sri Manoj Kumar singh, learned counsel for the petitioner in Writ – A No. 21223 of 2022, Sri P.K. Ganguly, learned Advocate appearing for the University namely Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut, Sri Rakesh Kumar, learned Advocate appearing for Chandra Shekhar Azad University in the respective petitions, Sri Ashok Mehta, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Sri Manoj Kumar Singh, learned Chief Standing Counsel and Sri P.K. Srivastava, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. All these petitions since raise common question of law, therefore, have been heard together and are being decided by this common judgment and writ petition of Dr. Anil Kumar Katiyar an
The amended definition of 'teacher' in the Uttar Pradesh State Agricultural Universities Act, 1958 operates prospectively, allowing petitioners employed in Krishi Vigyan Kendras to retire at 62 years....
The court established that a Senior Research Officer is classified as a Teacher under the university's statutes, entitled to benefits of extended service age.
Person appointed as visiting professor on honorary basis, could not claim the financial benefits of the salaried employee of the University as a Lecturer or other teachers of the University.
Person appointed as visiting professor on honorary basis, could not claim the financial benefits of the salaried employee of the University as a Lecturer or other teachers of the University.
University Grants Commission Regulations on superannuation are recommendatory and not binding on state universities, allowing discretion in their implementation.
The court established that the definition of 'Teacher' under the Uttar Pradesh University Act includes the petitioner, entitling him to retirement benefits at 65 years.
The definition of 'Teacher' under the U.P. Krishi Evam Prodyogik Vishwavidyalaya Adhiniyam, 1958, encompasses roles involved in research and extension, qualifying the petitioner for retirement benefi....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
