IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
JYOTSNA SHARMA, J.
Sri Ramesh Alias Mehandi Hasan - Petitioner
Versus
State of U.P. and Others - Respondents
Matters Under Article 227 No. 5804 of 2023
Decided On : 16-12-2023
Compensation - Criminal Law - 357, 357-A Cr.P.C. - Summary
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a victim of rape, sought compensation under section 357, 357-A Cr.P.C. The trial court dismissed the application based on a report stating ineligibility under a specific scheme.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the trial court was unaware of the relevant compensation scheme and did not consider the provisions of section 357-A Cr.P.C. The court emphasized that the matter of compensation can be considered by the trial court or the court of appeal, and the District Legal Services Authority should verify the claim and proceed as per the scheme.
Issues: The issues revolved around the eligibility for compensation under the Uttar Pradesh Victim Compensation Scheme 2014 and the trial court's awareness of the relevant provisions of law.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the trial court's role in recommending compensation is formal, and the eligibility and quantum of compensation fall within the jurisdiction of the District Legal Services Authority. It also highlighted the importance of considering the provisions of section 357-A Cr.P.C. and the right to seek compensation before the trial court or the court of appeal.
Final Decision: The petition was finally disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move a suitable application before the court considering the appeal or the concerned District Legal Services Authority, within a month.
JUDGMENT :
1. Sri Srikant Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.C. Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
2. This petition has been filed challenging the order dated 09.02.2023, passed in a case arising out of Case Crime No. 793 of 2010 under sections 363, 376 I.P.C. by which, the application moved by the victim in the light of order passed in Writ No. 41664 of 2018 for grant of compensation, was dismissed.
3. The relevant facts of the case are as below.
(ii) The learned Second Additional Sessions Judge also ordered that half of the fine shall be payable to the victim as compensation.
(iii) It is submitted by the petitioner that the convict is in judicial custody and he has filed an appeal challenging the above judgment and order. The convict is lodged in jail and the appeal is pending and that till now, no fine has been deposited, therefore, no compensation could be obtained by her.
(iv) The victim filed a Writ No. 41664 of 2018 with a prayer for grant of compensation under section 357, 357-A Cr.P.C. which was decided by the order passed by the High Court 18.12.2018 as below:
"Heard Sri Shailesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent nos.1 to 3.
By means of this writ petition, the petitioner no.1 through her mother, the petitioner no.2 is claiming compensation being victim of rape. The accused has been convicted.
Learned Standing Counsel submits that corpus has been created in pursuance to the provisions of Section 357 & 357 (A) of Cr.P.C. for that petitioners have to approach the same court.
In case, such an application is filed, the same be considered and decided, in accordance with law.
With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of."
(v) In pursuance of the aforesaid order, the victim moved an application dated 21.02.2019 before the trial court concerned. The District Probation Officer, Gautam Buddh Nagar, submitted a report stating therein that the scheme "Uttar Pradesh Rani Laxmi Bai Mahila Evam Bal Samman Kosh" was promulgated in the year 2015, whereas the incident of the instant case occurred in 2010, therefore, it shall not be possible to grant any compensation to the victim under that scheme.
(vi) The learned Sessions Judge, on the basis of aforesaid report, dismissed the application by passing an order on 09.02.2023. Now, this order is under challenge in this petition.
4. The way, the matter of compensation has been handled by the court concerned, gives an impression that the court was unaware of the scheme and the formalities required for grant of compensation as provided in U.P. Victim Compensation Scheme, 2014. Before I proceed further, I find it appropriate to go through the relevant provisions of law.
5. Section 357 Cr.P.C. provides that when a court imposes a sentence of fine while passing a final judgment, whole or any part of the fine recovered, may be applied for payment of compensation for any loss or injury caused to any person, however, no such payment shall be made before the period allowed for presenting the appeal has elapsed or if an appeal be presented, before the decision of the appeal.
6. Section 357-A, which has been introduced in Cr.P.C. by Act V of 2009 w.e.f. 31.12.2009, empowers the State Government, in coordination of the Central Government, to prepare a scheme for providing funds for the purpose of compensation to the victim or his dependents who suffered loss or injury as a result of a crime.
7. The provisions of Section 357-A Cr.P.C. are as below :
The court emphasized the formal role of the trial court in recommending compensation and highlighted the importance of considering the provisions of section 357-A Cr.P.C. for providing compensation t....
The amended provisions of Section 357A of Cr.P.C. and the Victim Compensation Scheme, 2011 are applicable to incidents that occurred prior to their enactment, entitling victims to compensation and re....
Victims of crimes are entitled to compensation under Section 357A of the Criminal Procedure Code, regardless of when the crime occurred, reflecting the duty of courts to ensure justice for victims.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.