MANISH MATHUR
Mahendra Pratap Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Panchayatiraj Deptt. Lko. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and Mr. Aniruddh Singh, learned State Counsel appearing for opposite parties 1 to 8. Affidavit of service has been filed indicating notice upon opposite party no.9 who has however not put in appearance.
2. Petition has been filed challenging order dated 30.06.2023 and relieving dated 01.07.2023 whereby petitioner has been transferred from District Bahraich to District Gonda on the post of Assistant Development Officer (Panchayat Raj). Also under challenge are consequential orders dated 03.07.2023, report dated 29.08.2023 as well as order dated 11.09.2023 whereby petitioner's representation against transfer has been rejected.
3. It has been submitted that earlier petitioner had filed WRIT A No. -6092 of 2023 challenging transfer order which was disposed of vide order dated 21.08.2023 directing the authority concerned to consider and decide petitioner's representation by a reasoned and speaking order. It is in pursuance thereof that order dated 11.09.2023 has been passed rejecting petitioner's representation.
4. Learned counsel for petitioner has drawn attention to fact that although impugned transfer order dated 30.06.2023 simply indica
Dharmendra Kumar Saxena v. State of U.P. and others reported in 2013(7) ADJ 53
Kalabharati Advertising v. Hemant Vimalnath Narichania and others reported in (2010) 9 SCC 437
Somesh Tiwari v. Union of India and others reported in (2009) 2 SCC 592
Sabhapati Pathak v. State of U.P. and others reported in 2012(30) LCD 1344
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.