SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 2979

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Ajay Bhanot
Megha Sanjeev Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Punjab And Sind Bank – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For Petitioner:- Ravindra Narayan Singh,Vishal Kashyap
For Respondent:- Sundeep Agarwal

JUDGMEMT

Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot, J.

1. Heard Sri Ravindra Narayan Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sundeep Agarwal, learned counsel for the respondents.

2. By the impugned order dated 10.01.2025 the petitioner has been transferred from Prayagraj branch to Bisani Pratapgarh.

3. The petitioner has assailed the impugned transfer order on the footing that it is actuated by mala fide and is penal in nature. Further as per the petitioner the transfer has been made on the basis of complaints which in itself is contrary to law.

4. The grounds on which the transfer order has been assailed shall be examined in the succeeding paragraphs.

5. A bare perusal of the transfer order and the attending circumstances discloses that a transfer order is not punitive in any manner. The petitioner has not been demoted to a lower post nor her salary has been lowered. The seniority of the petitioner does not get affected in any adverse manner.

6. The petitioner was posted at Prayagraj for a very long period of time between 2007-2025, except for a brief interlude from 19.11.2022 to 10.06.2024 when she was posted at Raipur. It is noteworthy that the husband of the petitioner is in the Railways and was

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top