SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 1676

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J.
M/s Palika Towns LLP – Petitioner
Versus
State of U.P. and Others – Respondents
Writ (C) No. 37712 of 2023
Decided On : 29-11-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Pankaj Dubey.

The main legal point established in the judgment is the applicability of stamp duty on properties purchased through e-auction and the interpretation of Article 18 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899.

Headnote:

Stamp Duty - Property Auction - Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Article 18, Section 56(1) - The court discussed the applicability of Article 18 of Schedule I-B of the Stamp Act to the property sold in e-auction, the authority empowered to sell the property, and the requirement of stamp duty payment. The court found in favor of the petitioner, quashing the order and directing the refund of the deposited stamp duty.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner challenged an order requiring payment of stamp duty on a property purchased through e-auction. The petitioner argued that as per Article 18 of the Stamp Act, the stamp duty should be based on the purchase money only.

Finding of the Court:

The court found in favor of the petitioner, stating that the petitioner is liable to pay stamp duty as per conveyance for a consideration equal to the amount of purchase money only, as per Article 18 of the Stamp Act.

Issues: The main issue was the applicability of stamp duty on a property purchased through e-auction and the authority empowered to sell the property.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the provisions of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, and the settled legal principles regarding the issuance and registration of sale certificates to support its decision in favor of the petitioner.

Final Decision: The court quashed the order and directed the refund of the deposited stamp duty.

JUDGMENT :

MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J.

1. The petitioner-M/s Palika Towns LLP, is a Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, has preferred present writ petition challenging an order dated 22.08.2023 passed by second respondent/Chief Controller Revenue Authority, Board of Revenue, Circuit Court, Meerut. It has also been prayed in the writ petition that the fourth respondent/ District Magistrate, Gautambuddha Nagar may be directed to refund the amount of Rs. 6,00,18,100/- with interest @ 15% p.m. deposited by the petitioner.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner Company has its registered office at DSC-319, DLF South Court, Saket, New Delhi-110017. A public notice was issued in daily newspaper Business Standard, New Delhi on 08.03.2019 for the sale of assets of M/s Moser Baer India Ltd., thus, insolvency proceedings were initiated against M/s Moser Baer India Ltd. under the Indian Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 [the Act 2016] before the National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi, in which official liquidator was appointed by order dated 20.09.2018. Accordingly, e-auction of the assets of M/s Moser Baer India Ltd. was conducted. The assets included industrial land building bearing no. 66, admeasuring area 270201 square meter situated at Sector Ecotech-2, Greater Noida, Gautambuddha Nagar.

3. The petitioner participated in the auction proceedings and being the highest bidder, purchased the property in question for a sum of Rs. 145,75,00,000/- in support of which a sale certificate dated 11.09.2019 was issued by official liquidator. The petitioner applied for the registration of sale certificate in terms of Article 18 of Schedule 1-B of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 [the Stamp Act] on 08.02.2021. The respondent no. 5 raised objections and calculation was made on 08.02.2021 by the Sub-Registrar, Sadar, Greater Noida, Gautambuddha Nagar/respondent no. 5, who issued a letter stating that the stamp duty is to be paid on the basis of market rate in terms of Article 23 of Schedule 1-B of the Stamp Act. The District Magistrate issued a letter dated 17.05.2021 to the Special Secretary, Stamp and Registration, U.P. referring to the issue related with applicability of Article 18 of Schedule I-B of the Stamp Act to the property sold out in e-auction and the same was replied by stating that the District Magistrate is fully competent to take decision. The District Magistrate vide order dated 23.07.2021 directed the petitioner to pay deficient stamp fee amount of Rs. 4,61,67,750/- along with interest at the rate of 1.5% per month from the date of execution till the date of making payment, as well as the deficient registration fee of Rs. 92,33,550/- and penalty of Rs. 4,61,200/- . The petitioner deposited an amount of Rs. 6,00,18,100/- under protest on 28.07.2021. Thereafter, a sale certificate was issued in favour of the petitioner and the instrument was registered on 30.07.2021 at Bahi No. 1, Zild No. 39084, Page Nos. 245-294 at S. No. 12873. The petitioner approached the Board of Revenue, Circuit Court, Meerut against the order dated 23.07.2021 passed by the District Magistrate under Section 56(1) of the Stamp Act, which was rejected on 22.08.2023 by the Chief Controller Revenue Authority, Board of Revenue, Circuit Court, Meerut without considering the provisions of law. Hence the present writ petition.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner purchased the property by means of e-auction and as per Article 18 of Schedule I-B of the Stamp Act, the petitioner is liable to pay stamp duty as per conveyance (no. 23) for a consideration equal to the amount of purchase money only. The State Government has issued Government Orders dated 24.06.2020 and 25.06.2020, clarifying that the property purchased through e-auction for registration of property, against which the stamp duty will be paid under Article 18 o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top