VIVEK KUMAR BIRLA, VINOD DIWAKAR
Manish Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
VINOD DIWAKAR, J.
1. We have heard Dr. C.P. Upadhyay, along with Shri Kumar Gaurav, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Rajesh Kumar Madhesia, learned State Law Officer, for the State-respondents.
2. The present petitions have arisen from the impugned First Information Report dated 21.08.2023, registered as Case Crime No. 178 of 2023, under sections 409, 419, 420 IPC at Police Station Sujanganj, District Jaunpur, in which the petitioners, namely Manish Kumar Singh, Smt. Pushpa Devi, Jawahar Lal and Vinod Kumar Saroj have been arrayed as accused along with one Sanjay Kumar Chauhan - who has not come before this Court. The petitioners are aggrieved by the registration of the impugned FIR and, therefore, approached this Court with twofold prayers: (i) quashing the impugned FIR and (ii) a stay of arrest.
3. The prosecution case is that on the complaint of some public representatives, the District Administration noticed certain irregularities in constructing Amrit Sarovar in District Jaunpur, Uttar Pradesh - A Central Government initiative to construct ponds in rural areas of India. On receipt of a complaint (reference may be invited to Annexure-5) of the Project Directo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.