MANJU RANI CHAUHAN
Brijraj Nishad – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Mr. Nipun Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Gyanendra Prakash Srivastava, learned counsel for the complainant and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer to quash the impugned order dated 07.08.2023 passed by the respondent no.2; District Magistrate/Prescribed Authority, Mau, vide which the administrative and financial power of the petitioner as Gram Pradhan has been ceased and a further prayer to direct the respondent not to interfere in the peaceful functioning of the petitioner as Gram Pradhan of Gram Panchayat Madahapatti, Mau.
3. The facts, in brief, giving rise to the present writ petition are as under:-
(ii) On the aforesaid complaint, a committee comprising of District Finance
UMC Technologies (P) Ltd. vs. Food Corporation of India and another
Oryx Fisheries Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India & Others
Nasir Ahmad v. Custodian General, Evacuee Property
Badrinath v. State of Tamil Nadu & Others
State of Kerala v. Puthenkavu N.S.S. Karayogam & Anr.
Mangal Prasad Tamoli (dead) by Lrs. v. Narvadeshwar Mishra (dead) by Lrs. & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.